Drexel

17-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.6%Drexel

87.4%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -12.7

PROJECTED TOTAL138.1

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -694

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDrexel 63

Projected Total138.1

Projected ScoreHofstra 75

Team Comparison

DrexelMetricHofstra

46.5MMH Power Index59.3

103.6Offensive Efficiency114.0

102.4Defensive Efficiency100.9

1.2Net Efficiency13.1

-0.4Strength of Schedule-2.9

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

65.7Tempo66.2

51.3%Effective FG%52.2%

19.1%Turnover Rate16.1%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

32.3%Free Throw Rate32.0%

0.8Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–46.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.6), defensive efficiency (100.9–102.4), net efficiency (13.1–1.2).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-2.9), free throw rate (32.3–32.0).

Final

Drexel

51—62

Hofstra

Hofstra by 11 • 56.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DrexelTEAM STATHofstra

16-49FG24-55

33.0%FG%44.0%

10-273PT5-20

37.0%3PT%25.0%

9-10FT9-14

90.0%FT%64.0%

27Rebounds43

9Offensive Rebounds18

11Assists8

11Turnovers14

5Steals7

5Blocks3

14Fouls12

Player Box Score

Drexel

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Shane Blakeney	G	38	5-16	4-8	1-2	5	0	1	0	15
Victor Panov	F	29	3-9	3-8	0-0	5	1	0	2	9
Garfield Turner	F	15	2-5	0-0	4-4	2	2	1	1	8
Kevon Vanderhorst	G	37	2-6	1-2	2-2	2	6	0	0	7
Josh Reed	G	14	2-2	0-0	2-2	2	1	0	0	6
Eli Beard	G	25	1-5	1-5	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Martin de LaPorterie	F	16	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Villiam Garcia Adsten	G	13	0-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Ralph Akuta	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Dillon Tingler	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	2	0	0
Max Davis	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Preston Edmead	G	40	6-13	4-9	3-3	7	2	0	0	19
Biggie Patterson	G	30	7-13	0-4	2-4	9	0	1	0	16
Cruz Davis	G	39	4-14	0-3	0-0	2	3	3	1	8
German Plotnikov	G	22	2-2	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	6
Silas Sunday	F	24	2-3	0-1	1-2	9	2	1	2	5
Joshua DeCady	F	10	2-5	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Joshua Aaron Reaves	G	18	1-3	1-2	0-0	3	0	2	0	3
Victory Onuetu	F	13	0-2	0-0	1-3	3	0	0	0	1
Alex Tsynkevich	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jaeden Roberts	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

56.8Possessions56.8

89.8Offensive Efficiency109.2

109.2Defensive Efficiency89.8

-19.4Net Efficiency19.4

42.9%Effective FG%48.2%

47.4%True Shooting %50.3%

19.7%Turnover Rate24.3%

20.4%Free Throw Rate25.5%

55.1%3-Point Rate36.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.57

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 56.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.