Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

35.2%Grambling

64.8%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -4.0

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -184

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 73

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricAlabama A&M

41.4MMH Power Index42.3

100.7Offensive Efficiency105.9

100.4Defensive Efficiency106.6

0.3Net Efficiency-0.7

-5.7Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

69.9Tempo68.0

49.2%Effective FG%49.7%

20.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

42.2%Free Throw Rate45.7%

0.2Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Grambling

63—77

Alabama A&M

Alabama A&M by 14 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATAlabama A&M

23-56FG24-50

41.0%FG%48.0%

6-213PT9-17

29.0%3PT%53.0%

11-14FT20-25

79.0%FT%80.0%

31Rebounds32

11Offensive Rebounds8

13Assists14

13Turnovers9

3Steals4

2Blocks4

21Fouls14

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamil Muttilib	G	32	6-11	2-5	2-3	7	1	1	1	16
Derrius Ward	G	37	3-9	2-7	2-2	1	0	1	0	10
Antonio Munoz	F	20	2-4	0-0	4-4	2	0	0	0	8
Mekhi Fitts	F	19	4-7	0-0	0-1	4	1	0	0	8
Roderick Coffee III	F	31	2-6	1-4	2-2	5	7	1	0	7
Rickey Ballard	F	20	2-5	1-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	5
Devyn Franklin	G	16	2-6	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Richard Amaefule	F	5	1-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	3
Jimel Lane	F	19	1-7	0-1	0-0	6	3	0	1	2
Chancellor Perkins	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Koron Davis	G	34	4-8	1-3	6-6	7	1	0	0	15
Lou Hutchinson	G	22	5-6	2-2	2-2	1	1	0	0	14
Sami Pissis	G	31	5-12	2-5	0-0	3	4	2	0	12
Kintavious Dozier	G	33	4-9	2-5	0-0	5	1	0	0	10
PJ Eason	F	32	2-7	0-0	5-7	6	3	1	4	9
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	16	1-2	1-1	6-8	1	4	1	0	9
James Graham III	G	16	3-5	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	7
Angok Anyang	F	5	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Jalen Carruth	G	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Samuel Onu	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

98.7Offensive Efficiency120.7

120.7Defensive Efficiency98.7

-21.9Net Efficiency21.9

46.4%Effective FG%57.0%

50.3%True Shooting %62.2%

20.1%Turnover Rate14.3%

25.0%Free Throw Rate50.0%

37.5%3-Point Rate34.0%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.56

Game Summary

Alabama A&M won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.