
Fordham
17-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.1%Fordham
37.9%La Salle
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.2
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -164

La Salle
9-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFordham 70
Projected Total137.2
Projected ScoreLa Salle 67
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index41.3
105.9Offensive Efficiency100.8
99.3Defensive Efficiency111.3
6.6Net Efficiency-10.5
-2.4Strength of Schedule4.6
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-13.9
65.9Tempo66.5
50.0%Effective FG%46.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate18.2%
34.5%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
26.9%Free Throw Rate38.3%
4.4Average Margin-7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fordham HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–41.3), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.8), defensive efficiency (99.3–111.3), net efficiency (6.6–-10.5).
La Salle COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.6–-2.4), free throw rate (38.3–26.9).