
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.4%UAB
41.6%Charlotte
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -140

Charlotte
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 77
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreCharlotte 75
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index49.3
110.5Offensive Efficiency111.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency113.3
7.6Net Efficiency-1.7
0.4Strength of Schedule2.9
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
71.7Tempo65.7
48.8%Effective FG%53.7%
12.4%Turnover Rate18.2%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.7%
36.9%Free Throw Rate37.2%
5.4Average Margin-1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–49.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–113.3), net efficiency (7.6–-1.7), recent form (2.9–-5.2).
Charlotte COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.6–110.5), strength of schedule (2.9–0.4), shooting efficiency (53.7–48.8).