Bethune-Cookman

17-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

50.6%Bethune-Cookman

49.4%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -0.8

PROJECTED TOTAL149.9

MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -102

Florida A&M

14-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 75

Projected Total149.9

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 75

Team Comparison

Bethune-CookmanMetricFlorida A&M

44.2MMH Power Index39.4

104.7Offensive Efficiency98.7

106.9Defensive Efficiency105.6

-2.2Net Efficiency-6.9

-3.3Strength of Schedule-3.2

4.0Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5

72.0Tempo70.6

51.9%Effective FG%49.2%

19.2%Turnover Rate21.6%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

41.9%Free Throw Rate38.0%

-1.6Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–39.4), offensive efficiency (104.7–98.7), net efficiency (-2.2–-6.9), shooting efficiency (51.9–49.2).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.6–106.9), strength of schedule (-3.2–-3.3), recent form (4.5–4.0).

Final

Bethune-Cookman

77—81

Florida A&M

Florida A&M by 4 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Bethune-CookmanTEAM STATFlorida A&M

25-50FG26-63

50.0%FG%41.0%

2-83PT6-20

25.0%3PT%30.0%

25-33FT23-27

76.0%FT%85.0%

29Rebounds38

7Offensive Rebounds16

8Assists6

16Turnovers9

7Steals13

1Blocks—

22Fouls21

Player Box Score

Bethune-Cookman

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jakobi Heady	G	39	8-12	1-3	2-3	3	2	2	0	19
Ariel Bland	F	29	4-6	0-0	6-8	10	1	0	0	14
Quentin Heady	F	33	4-5	0-0	5-6	4	0	2	0	13
Jordan Johnson	G	21	4-7	1-3	2-2	2	0	1	0	11
Daniel Rouzan	F	20	4-9	0-1	1-1	5	0	0	0	9
Arterio Morris	G	28	1-9	0-1	4-8	3	4	2	1	6
Seneca Willoughby	G	21	0-1	0-0	5-5	1	1	0	0	5
Tyler Andrews	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Rickey Mitchell Jr.	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jaquan Sanders	G	29	5-13	3-6	5-5	7	2	0	18
Tyler Shirley	F	34	5-11	0-2	7-8	0	1	2	17
Antonio Baker Jr.	G	28	7-12	0-1	0-0	3	0	2	14
Kaleb Washington	F	24	3-9	0-2	5-6	6	0	3	11
Micah Octave	G	36	3-7	1-4	2-2	11	2	5	9
Jordan Chatman	G	29	2-6	2-5	1-2	0	1	1	7
Miles Ndalama	C	18	1-5	0-0	3-4	5	0	0	5
Tuscan Onuoha	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8

107.2Offensive Efficiency112.8

112.8Defensive Efficiency107.2

-5.6Net Efficiency5.6

52.0%Effective FG%46.0%

58.6%True Shooting %53.4%

21.4%Turnover Rate13.1%

66.0%Free Throw Rate42.9%

16.0%3-Point Rate31.7%

0.50Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.