
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.4%Tulane
77.6%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -9.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -346

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 69
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScoreTemple 78
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index50.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.2
109.9Defensive Efficiency107.4
-4.6Net Efficiency4.8
2.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
68.7Tempo65.9
49.6%Effective FG%51.1%
15.6%Turnover Rate13.7%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
44.8%Free Throw Rate42.3%
-3.2Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Temple HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (112.2–105.3), defensive efficiency (107.4–109.9), net efficiency (4.8–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.0), free throw rate (44.8–42.3).