UT Arlington logo

UT Arlington

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.2%UT Arlington
48.8%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTarleton State -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -105
Tarleton State logo

Tarleton State

14-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 71
Projected Total142.3
Projected ScoreTarleton State 71

Team Comparison

49.6MMH Power Index44.6
102.7Offensive Efficiency103.2
97.9Defensive Efficiency101.6
4.8Net Efficiency1.6
-0.8Strength of Schedule-2.3
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
68.1Tempo72.2
48.5%Effective FG%49.0%
20.4%Turnover Rate19.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
43.7%Free Throw Rate42.8%
3.3Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
83
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–44.6), defensive efficiency (97.9–101.6), net efficiency (4.8–1.6), strength of schedule (-0.8–-2.3).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.2–102.7), shooting efficiency (49.0–48.5), ball security (19.9–20.4).
Final
UT Arlington logo
UT Arlington
6560
Tarleton State logo
Tarleton State
UT Arlington by 560.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATTarleton State
18-44FG19-47
41.0%FG%40.0%
5-213PT3-11
24.0%3PT%27.0%
24-28FT19-31
86.0%FT%61.0%
33Rebounds29
10Offensive Rebounds13
7Assists8
14Turnovers11
5Steals5
5Blocks2
22Fouls20

Player Box Score

UT Arlington
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cash ChavisG298-132-30-012100018
Jordan LoweryG365-112-74-641300016
Bahsil LasterG240-10-111-1272010011
Raysean SeamsterF311-50-23-46111005
Marcus Rigsby Jr.G92-51-40-01000005
Cameron JacksonF241-20-02-22102004
Amari ReedF131-10-02-23001004
Marcell McCrearyG200-50-42-24000002
Tyran MasonG110-10-00-02000000
Miles GoodmanF30-00-00-00000000
Tarleton State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dior JohnsonG308-162-410-1130200028
Chris MpakaF233-60-02-78001008
Jordan MizellG323-70-10-23400006
DJ DormuG102-30-02-20110006
Ocypher OwensF202-41-20-02000005
Freddy HicksG340-50-02-44211002
Leroy Kelly IVG240-20-22-33110002
Kaia IsaacG161-30-10-01000002
Kade DouglasG110-10-11-20000001

Advanced Game Stats

60.5Possessions60.5
107.4Offensive Efficiency99.2
99.2Defensive Efficiency107.4
8.3Net Efficiency-8.3
46.6%Effective FG%43.6%
56.7%True Shooting %48.6%
22.8%Turnover Rate18.4%
63.6%Free Throw Rate66.0%
47.7%3-Point Rate23.4%
0.50Assist / Turnover0.73
Game Summary
UT Arlington won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 60.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.