UT Arlington logo

UT Arlington

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.2%UT Arlington
48.8%Tarleton State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTarleton State -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.3
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -105
Tarleton State logo

Tarleton State

14-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 71
Projected Total142.3
Projected ScoreTarleton State 71

Team Comparison

49.6MMH Power Index44.6
102.7Offensive Efficiency103.2
97.9Defensive Efficiency101.6
4.8Net Efficiency1.6
-0.8Strength of Schedule-2.3
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
68.1Tempo72.2
48.5%Effective FG%49.0%
20.4%Turnover Rate19.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
43.7%Free Throw Rate42.8%
3.3Average Margin1.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–44.6), defensive efficiency (97.9–101.6), net efficiency (4.8–1.6), strength of schedule (-0.8–-2.3).
Tarleton State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.2–102.7), shooting efficiency (49.0–48.5), ball security (19.9–20.4).
Final
UT Arlington logo
UT Arlington
65—60
Tarleton State logo
Tarleton State
UT Arlington by 5 • 60.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATTarleton State
18-44FG19-47
41.0%FG%40.0%
5-213PT3-11
24.0%3PT%27.0%
24-28FT19-31
86.0%FT%61.0%
33Rebounds29
10Offensive Rebounds13
7Assists8
14Turnovers11
5Steals5
5Blocks2
22Fouls20

Player Box Score

UT Arlington
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cash ChavisG298-132-30-012100018
Jordan LoweryG365-112-74-641300016
Bahsil LasterG240-10-111-1272010011
Raysean SeamsterF311-50-23-46111005
Marcus Rigsby Jr.G92-51-40-01000005
Cameron JacksonF241-20-02-22102004
Amari ReedF131-10-02-23001004
Marcell McCrearyG200-50-42-24000002
Tyran MasonG110-10-00-02000000
Miles GoodmanF30-00-00-00000000
Tarleton State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dior JohnsonG308-162-410-1130200028
Chris MpakaF233-60-02-78001008
Jordan MizellG323-70-10-23400006
DJ DormuG102-30-02-20110006
Ocypher OwensF202-41-20-02000005
Freddy HicksG340-50-02-44211002
Leroy Kelly IVG240-20-22-33110002
Kaia IsaacG161-30-10-01000002
Kade DouglasG110-10-11-20000001

Advanced Game Stats

60.5Possessions60.5
107.4Offensive Efficiency99.2
99.2Defensive Efficiency107.4
8.3Net Efficiency-8.3
46.6%Effective FG%43.6%
56.7%True Shooting %48.6%
22.8%Turnover Rate18.4%
63.6%Free Throw Rate66.0%
47.7%3-Point Rate23.4%
0.50Assist / Turnover0.73
Game Summary
UT Arlington won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 60.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.