
Cincinnati
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.3%Cincinnati
57.7%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -136

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 71
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreTCU 74
Team Comparison
61.5MMH Power Index59.7
105.3Offensive Efficiency110.2
97.3Defensive Efficiency102.7
8.0Net Efficiency7.5
5.1Strength of Schedule4.6
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.4Tempo70.2
50.6%Effective FG%50.5%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.3%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
30.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.5Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–59.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.0–7.5), strength of schedule (5.1–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.2–105.3), ball security (15.3–17.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–30.6).