Cincinnati logo

Cincinnati

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.3%Cincinnati
57.7%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -136
TCU logo

TCU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 71
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreTCU 74

Team Comparison

61.5MMH Power Index59.7
105.3Offensive Efficiency110.2
97.3Defensive Efficiency102.7
8.0Net Efficiency7.5
5.1Strength of Schedule4.6
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
69.4Tempo70.2
50.6%Effective FG%50.5%
17.0%Turnover Rate15.3%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
30.7%Free Throw Rate38.3%
5.5Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–59.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.0–7.5), strength of schedule (5.1–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.2–105.3), ball security (15.3–17.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–30.6).
Final
Cincinnati logo
Cincinnati
6373
TCU logo
TCU
TCU by 1063.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CincinnatiTEAM STATTCU
23-52FG26-59
44.0%FG%44.0%
13-313PT6-22
42.0%3PT%27.0%
4-6FT15-21
67.0%FT%71.0%
37Rebounds30
11Offensive Rebounds11
19Assists21
19Turnovers6
3Steals8
5Blocks1
18Fouls10

Player Box Score

Cincinnati
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Day Day ThomasG377-145-110-041120019
Jalen CelestineG294-94-80-034010012
Jizzle JamesG344-93-70-022010011
Moustapha ThiamC284-80-10-05011008
Baba MillerF341-40-22-214300004
Keyshuan TilleryG141-30-02-40400004
Shon AbaevG21-11-10-00000003
Halvine DzellatC91-10-00-03000002
Sencire HarrisG130-30-10-01510000
TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jayden PierreG327-111-33-455200018
Liutauras LeleviciusG264-92-64-440100014
David PunchF334-60-05-647300013
Xavier EdmondsF234-81-20-12011009
Brock HardingG322-60-13-61600007
Micah RobinsonF303-111-60-04200007
Tanner ToolsonG212-61-30-04100005
Vianney SalatchoumC20-10-00-00010000
Trey StuartG10-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

63.5Possessions63.5
99.2Offensive Efficiency115.0
115.0Defensive Efficiency99.2
-15.7Net Efficiency15.7
56.7%Effective FG%49.2%
57.4%True Shooting %52.9%
30.2%Turnover Rate9.4%
11.5%Free Throw Rate35.6%
59.6%3-Point Rate37.3%
1.00Assist / Turnover3.50
Game Summary
TCU won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.