
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.7%Columbia
64.3%Harvard
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL142.7
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -180

Harvard
17-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 69
Projected Total142.7
Projected ScoreHarvard 73
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index52.6
112.4Offensive Efficiency108.1
105.2Defensive Efficiency102.9
7.2Net Efficiency5.2
-1.7Strength of Schedule-0.1
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3
68.2Tempo64.8
54.4%Effective FG%53.4%
19.1%Turnover Rate17.2%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %26.3%
28.8%Free Throw Rate27.9%
5.0Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.4–108.1), net efficiency (7.2–5.2), shooting efficiency (54.4–53.4), offensive rebounding (37.3–26.3).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.6–51.9), defensive efficiency (102.9–105.2), strength of schedule (-0.1–-1.7).