Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.2%Pittsburgh
66.8%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSyracuse -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINESyracuse -201
Syracuse logo

Syracuse

15-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePittsburgh 70
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreSyracuse 76

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index52.2
108.4Offensive Efficiency109.2
110.4Defensive Efficiency106.6
-2.0Net Efficiency2.6
5.5Strength of Schedule5.6
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
65.0Tempo69.0
51.4%Effective FG%52.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.6%
33.1%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
31.2%Free Throw Rate36.2%
-1.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Syracuse HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSyracuse holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.2–50.5), offensive efficiency (109.2–108.4), defensive efficiency (106.6–110.4), net efficiency (2.6–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-6.9–-15.1), offensive rebounding (33.1–29.0).
Final
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
7169
Syracuse logo
Syracuse
Pittsburgh by 268.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATSyracuse
26-59FG23-59
44.0%FG%39.0%
6-263PT7-24
23.0%3PT%29.0%
13-20FT16-17
65.0%FT%94.0%
39Rebounds34
11Offensive Rebounds9
8Assists10
11Turnovers10
8Steals3
2Blocks5
17Fouls19

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron CorhenF368-141-24-411110021
Barry Dunning Jr.G445-102-45-761200017
Nojus IndrusaitisG307-141-71-261200016
Roman SiulepaF373-41-20-49010007
Damarco MinorG431-100-93-38310005
Omari WitherspoonG222-71-20-02101005
Kieran MullenC80-00-00-01000000
Macari MooreG50-00-00-01110000
Syracuse
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Naithan GeorgeG408-174-106-664200026
Donnie FreemanF435-140-38-9131000018
Nate KingzG355-82-52-201000014
William Kyle IIIF313-50-00-02114006
Tyler BetseyF261-51-30-03000003
Bryce ZephirG91-30-10-01000002
J.J. StarlingG270-70-20-01300000
Ibrahim SouareF140-00-00-03001000

Advanced Game Stats

68.3Possessions68.3
104.0Offensive Efficiency101.0
101.0Defensive Efficiency104.0
2.9Net Efficiency-2.9
49.2%Effective FG%44.9%
51.8%True Shooting %51.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate14.7%
33.9%Free Throw Rate28.8%
44.1%3-Point Rate40.7%
0.73Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Pittsburgh won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 68.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.