Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.9%Texas A&M

52.1%LSU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLSU -1.3

PROJECTED TOTAL161.4

MODEL MONEYLINELSU -109

LSU

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 80

Projected Total161.4

Projected ScoreLSU 81

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricLSU

58MMH Power Index54.2

116.1Offensive Efficiency115.5

108.4Defensive Efficiency111.3

7.7Net Efficiency4.2

4.8Strength of Schedule4.5

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8

69.1Tempo70.5

53.5%Effective FG%53.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

37.5%Free Throw Rate41.9%

5.3Average Margin2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–54.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.3), net efficiency (7.7–4.2).

LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–31.7), free throw rate (41.9–37.5).

Final

Texas A&M

94—91

LSU

Texas A&M by 3 • 92.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATLSU

31-84FG31-70

37.0%FG%44.0%

10-333PT8-28

30.0%3PT%29.0%

22-32FT21-30

69.0%FT%70.0%

49Rebounds54

18Offensive Rebounds13

10Assists17

10Turnovers22

17Steals9

5Blocks7

20Fouls23

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	47	8-21	2-4	8-9	11	2	0	2	26
Rylan Griffen	G	46	7-16	5-8	5-8	7	3	6	3	24
Pop Isaacs	G	45	6-12	1-6	5-8	7	3	3	0	18
Ali Dibba	G	37	5-8	0-1	2-4	1	0	5	0	12
Zach Clemence	F	40	2-11	0-7	1-2	12	0	0	0	5
Marcus Hill	G	20	1-5	0-0	1-1	5	1	2	0	3
Rubén Dominguez	G	19	1-5	1-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Josh Holloway	G	13	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
Federiko Federiko	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jacari Lane	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Max Mackinnon	G	48	7-20	2-11	4-6	4	3	2	0	20
Jalen Reece	G	51	7-12	2-5	1-2	4	5	3	1	17
Mike Nwoko	F	31	2-6	0-0	12-14	13	0	0	1	16
Marquel Sutton	F	50	4-7	2-4	2-2	7	2	1	0	12
Robert Miller III	F	30	6-10	0-0	0-1	8	3	2	4	12
Pablo Tamba	F	26	3-5	0-0	2-5	9	1	0	1	8
Rashad King	G	30	2-6	2-4	0-0	4	3	1	0	6
PJ Carter	G	7	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Mazi Mosley	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

92.3Possessions92.3

101.8Offensive Efficiency98.6

98.6Defensive Efficiency101.8

3.3Net Efficiency-3.3

42.9%Effective FG%50.0%

47.4%True Shooting %54.0%

11.0%Turnover Rate23.6%

38.1%Free Throw Rate42.9%

39.3%3-Point Rate40.0%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.77

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 92.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.