Oklahoma logo

Oklahoma

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.9%Oklahoma
61.1%Texas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL164.0
MODEL MONEYLINETexas -157
Texas logo

Texas

21-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 80
Projected Total164.0
Projected ScoreTexas 84

Team Comparison

62.1MMH Power Index61.6
119.5Offensive Efficiency119.6
111.6Defensive Efficiency110.1
7.9Net Efficiency9.5
3.2Strength of Schedule5.3
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4
69.4Tempo69.2
55.1%Effective FG%55.1%
14.4%Turnover Rate15.5%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %35.9%
36.2%Free Throw Rate44.3%
5.5Average Margin6.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
73
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (119.6–119.5), defensive efficiency (110.1–111.6), net efficiency (9.5–7.9), strength of schedule (5.3–3.2).
Oklahoma COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (62.1–61.6), recent form (12.3–-5.4), ball security (14.4–15.5).
Final
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
8885
Texas logo
Texas
Oklahoma by 377.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OklahomaTEAM STATTexas
27-61FG25-61
44.0%FG%41.0%
7-203PT10-30
35.0%3PT%33.0%
27-34FT25-29
79.0%FT%86.0%
40Rebounds35
10Offensive Rebounds9
13Assists14
10Turnovers12
8Steals5
4Blocks1
22Fouls24

Player Box Score

Oklahoma
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nijel PackG317-143-76-852000023
Xzayvier BrownG408-182-43-324400021
Tae DavisF344-90-16-1092100014
Derrion ReidF312-41-26-631010011
Mohamed WagueF253-30-02-25121008
Dayton ForsytheG182-61-10-01000005
Kirill ElatontsevC121-30-22-23100004
Jadon JonesG310-30-32-37212002
Kai RogersF30-10-00-01000000
Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan PopeG418-257-187-762100030
Dailyn SwainG415-81-27-978300018
Tramon MarkG344-122-67-920100017
Matas VokietaitisC345-60-04-462010014
Nic CodieF241-30-00-05000002
Chendall WeaverG211-20-00-04100002
Camden HeideF211-40-30-01000002
Simeon WilcherG90-10-10-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

77.5Possessions77.5
113.5Offensive Efficiency109.7
109.7Defensive Efficiency113.5
3.9Net Efficiency-3.9
50.0%Effective FG%49.2%
57.0%True Shooting %56.8%
13.0%Turnover Rate15.4%
55.7%Free Throw Rate47.5%
32.8%3-Point Rate49.2%
1.30Assist / Turnover1.17
Game Summary
Oklahoma won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 77.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.