
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.3%Temple
88.7%Tulsa
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -14.1
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -785

Tulsa
30-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 70
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreTulsa 84
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index64.8
112.2Offensive Efficiency121.1
107.4Defensive Efficiency104.8
4.8Net Efficiency16.3
-2.0Strength of Schedule0.0
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3
65.9Tempo70.2
51.1%Effective FG%55.4%
13.7%Turnover Rate15.4%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %33.8%
42.3%Free Throw Rate42.4%
3.2Average Margin11.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY88.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–50.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–112.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–107.4), net efficiency (16.3–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHball security (13.7–15.4).