UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.6%UTSA

89.4%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -14.8

PROJECTED TOTAL151.3

MODEL MONEYLINERice -843

Rice

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 68

Projected Total151.3

Projected ScoreRice 83

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricRice

30.5MMH Power Index45.1

99.0Offensive Efficiency108.3

115.0Defensive Efficiency109.2

-16.0Net Efficiency-0.9

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

70.2Tempo68.3

45.9%Effective FG%49.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate17.8%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-11.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.2–115.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.8).

Final

UTSA

71—80

Rice

Rice by 9 • 68.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATRice

25-70FG30-78

36.0%FG%38.0%

7-283PT12-46

25.0%3PT%26.0%

14-23FT8-14

61.0%FT%57.0%

47Rebounds50

17Offensive Rebounds20

9Assists13

5Turnovers4

3Steals4

3Blocks4

12Fouls13

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Baboucarr Njie	F	30	5-10	0-1	6-10	4	2	1	0	16
Brent Moss	G	28	6-18	2-8	2-4	10	1	1	1	16
Matheo Coffi	F	38	5-7	2-3	0-0	14	2	0	2	12
Jamir Simpson	G	38	5-15	0-4	1-2	5	2	0	0	11
Dorian Hayes	G	38	2-11	2-8	3-5	3	2	0	0	9
LJ Brown	G	16	2-5	1-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	5
Daniel Akitoby	F	12	0-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	2

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Smith	G	32	10-25	5-17	0-0	6	2	1	0	25
Nick Anderson	G	24	7-14	6-12	0-0	3	2	1	0	20
Trae Broadnax	G	31	4-10	0-6	4-4	5	5	1	0	12
Andrew Akuchie	F	28	3-7	0-1	0-0	8	1	0	2	6
Stephen Giwa	C	20	2-2	0-0	2-4	10	0	0	0	6
Trey Patterson	F	8	2-5	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	5
Eternity Eguagie	F	9	2-5	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	1	4
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	F	11	0-1	0-0	2-6	2	1	0	0	2
Cam Carroll	G	23	0-7	0-5	0-0	4	2	0	1	0
Bodey Howell	G	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
George Perkins	F	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.8Possessions68.8

103.2Offensive Efficiency116.3

116.3Defensive Efficiency103.2

-13.1Net Efficiency13.1

40.7%Effective FG%46.2%

43.9%True Shooting %47.3%

7.3%Turnover Rate5.8%

32.9%Free Throw Rate17.9%

40.0%3-Point Rate59.0%

1.80Assist / Turnover3.25

Game Summary

Rice won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 68.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.