East Carolina

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.9%East Carolina

87.1%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL153.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -675

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Carolina 70

Projected Total153.2

Projected ScoreUAB 84

Team Comparison

East CarolinaMetricUAB

44.3MMH Power Index56.9

102.0Offensive Efficiency110.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency102.9

-8.5Net Efficiency7.6

2.6Strength of Schedule0.4

-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

70.1Tempo71.7

46.7%Effective FG%48.8%

17.4%Turnover Rate12.4%

33.9%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

40.2%Free Throw Rate36.9%

-5.9Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–102.0), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.5), net efficiency (7.6–-8.5).

East Carolina COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.6–0.4), offensive rebounding (33.9–32.7), free throw rate (40.2–36.9).

Final

East Carolina

83—90

UAB

UAB by 7 • 76.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East CarolinaTEAM STATUAB

30-73FG35-64

41.0%FG%55.0%

7-223PT4-12

32.0%3PT%33.0%

16-21FT16-22

76.0%FT%73.0%

44Rebounds34

18Offensive Rebounds7

14Assists20

12Turnovers8

6Steals8

2Blocks4

13Fouls14

Player Box Score

East Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Demitri Gardner	G	36	8-13	3-5	0-0	2	2	2	0	19
Giovanni Emejuru	C	35	5-9	0-0	5-6	14	1	0	0	15
Reid Cason	F	19	6-8	0-0	2-4	4	0	0	2	14
Corey Caulker	G	34	5-15	3-8	0-0	1	5	0	0	13
Jordan Riley	G	38	3-20	0-4	5-7	9	2	3	0	11
Luke Davis	F	26	3-5	1-2	2-2	8	2	1	0	9
Isaiah Mbeng	G	11	0-2	0-2	2-2	1	2	0	0	2
Paddy D'Arcy	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chance Westry	G	35	8-11	0-2	6-7	4	10	1	1	22
Daniel Rivera	F	29	9-10	0-0	4-6	5	3	1	0	22
Jacob Meyer	G	36	6-10	4-5	2-5	6	2	1	0	18
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	26	5-9	0-0	2-2	8	3	2	1	12
Quaran McPherson	G	18	3-5	0-1	2-2	3	1	0	0	8
Dayjaun Anderson	G	19	3-6	0-3	0-0	1	0	3	0	6
Evan Chatman	F	23	1-10	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	2
Salim London	G	14	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.3Possessions76.3

108.8Offensive Efficiency118.0

118.0Defensive Efficiency108.8

-9.2Net Efficiency9.2

45.9%Effective FG%57.8%

50.0%True Shooting %60.4%

15.6%Turnover Rate10.6%

28.8%Free Throw Rate34.4%

30.1%3-Point Rate18.8%

1.17Assist / Turnover2.50

Game Summary

UAB won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 76.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.