Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.4%Hofstra

28.6%Drexel

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -4.9

PROJECTED TOTAL138.1

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -250

Drexel

17-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 71

Projected Total138.1

Projected ScoreDrexel 67

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricDrexel

59.3MMH Power Index46.5

114.0Offensive Efficiency103.6

100.9Defensive Efficiency102.4

13.1Net Efficiency1.2

-2.9Strength of Schedule-0.4

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

66.2Tempo65.7

52.2%Effective FG%51.3%

16.1%Turnover Rate19.1%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.7%

32.0%Free Throw Rate32.3%

8.7Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–46.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.6), defensive efficiency (100.9–102.4), net efficiency (13.1–1.2).

Drexel COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.4–-2.9), free throw rate (32.3–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

55—60

Drexel

Drexel by 5 • 62.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATDrexel

19-53FG22-55

36.0%FG%40.0%

6-213PT5-18

29.0%3PT%28.0%

11-16FT11-18

69.0%FT%61.0%

32Rebounds41

9Offensive Rebounds14

15Assists8

12Turnovers11

6Steals7

1Blocks6

16Fouls14

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jean Aranguren	G	35	3-11	3-5	5-7	7	5	1	0	14
Cruz Davis	G	34	3-10	1-5	3-6	3	3	2	0	10
Michael Graham	Forward	29	4-6	0-0	0-0	13	2	1	1	8
TJ Gadsden	Guard	32	2-5	1-3	2-2	1	3	2	0	7
German Plotnikov	G	23	2-7	1-4	1-1	1	1	0	0	6
Silas Sunday	F	11	3-6	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Khalil Farmer	G	21	2-5	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
KiJan Robinson	G	8	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jaquan Sanders	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Drexel

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cole Hargrove	F	34	6-12	0-2	3-6	9	1	3	1	15
Yame Butler	G	33	5-14	2-7	2-4	8	0	0	2	14
Kobe MaGee	G	31	3-6	1-2	1-1	7	0	0	0	8
Jason Drake	G	21	2-6	1-2	2-2	1	3	2	0	7
Kevon Vanderhorst	G	19	2-5	1-2	2-2	3	1	1	1	7
Shane Blakeney	G	26	2-6	0-2	1-3	3	2	0	0	5
Victor Panov	F	21	2-5	0-1	0-0	5	1	0	1	4
Villiam Garcia Adsten	G	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Clem Edomwonyin	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.1Possessions62.1

88.6Offensive Efficiency96.6

96.6Defensive Efficiency88.6

-8.1Net Efficiency8.1

41.5%Effective FG%44.5%

45.4%True Shooting %47.2%

18.9%Turnover Rate18.2%

30.2%Free Throw Rate32.7%

39.6%3-Point Rate32.7%

1.25Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

Drexel won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 62.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.