UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

67.7%UT Rio Grande Valley

32.3%Incarnate Word

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.8

PROJECTED TOTAL147.9

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -210

Incarnate Word

12-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76

Projected Total147.9

Projected ScoreIncarnate Word 72

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricIncarnate Word

55.8MMH Power Index44.6

112.6Offensive Efficiency112.0

103.1Defensive Efficiency111.2

9.5Net Efficiency0.8

-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.6

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.5

67.4Tempo66.3

55.7%Effective FG%52.2%

17.9%Turnover Rate16.8%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %34.4%

29.6%Free Throw Rate34.0%

6.4Average Margin0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–112.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–111.2), net efficiency (9.5–0.8).

Incarnate Word COUNTERS WITHball security (16.8–17.9), offensive rebounding (34.4–29.2), free throw rate (34.0–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

85—78

Incarnate Word

UT Rio Grande Valley by 7 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATIncarnate Word

37-53FG32-66

70.0%FG%48.0%

3-143PT10-21

21.0%3PT%48.0%

8-12FT4-5

67.0%FT%80.0%

24Rebounds30

4Offensive Rebounds14

14Assists13

12Turnovers12

7Steals7

7Blocks—

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kwo Agwa	F	31	10-14	1-3	2-4	3	0	1	4	23
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	33	7-7	0-0	3-4	2	0	2	0	17
Cliff Davis	G	35	7-10	2-5	0-0	2	2	3	2	16
K.T. Raimey	Guard	23	5-7	0-1	3-4	4	3	1	0	13
Trey Miller	G	34	6-7	0-1	0-0	0	6	0	0	12
DK Thorn	Guard	29	2-7	0-3	0-0	4	3	0	0	4
Marshal Destremau	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	0
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
RJ Nance	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Incarnate Word

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Davion Bailey	G	40	11-16	5-9	1-1	1	1	2	28
Jalin Anderson	Point Guard	36	8-19	2-6	0-0	4	6	1	18
Dylan Hayman	Forward	37	5-13	2-3	2-2	8	0	1	14
Jordan Pyke	F	21	5-10	1-3	0-0	3	3	1	11
Marcus Glover	F	27	1-2	0-0	1-1	6	1	0	3
Lamin Sabally	F	15	1-3	0-0	0-1	2	1	2	2
Jayden Williams	C	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2
TJ Ford Jr.	Point Guard	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0
Kobi Bowles	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6

127.6Offensive Efficiency117.1

117.1Defensive Efficiency127.6

10.5Net Efficiency-10.5

72.6%Effective FG%56.1%

72.4%True Shooting %57.0%

18.0%Turnover Rate18.1%

22.6%Free Throw Rate7.6%

26.4%3-Point Rate31.8%

1.17Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.