Mississippi Valley State logo

Mississippi Valley State

3-30
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.1%Mississippi Valley State
94.9%Florida A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -20.3
PROJECTED TOTAL146.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -1861
Florida A&M logo

Florida A&M

14-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 63
Projected Total146.7
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 84

Team Comparison

17.7MMH Power Index39.4
91.1Offensive Efficiency98.7
117.8Defensive Efficiency105.6
-26.7Net Efficiency-6.9
-4.1Strength of Schedule-3.2
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5
70.5Tempo70.6
45.8%Effective FG%49.2%
21.8%Turnover Rate21.6%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.5%
34.5%Free Throw Rate38.0%
-18.8Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Florida A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (39.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (98.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (105.6–117.8), net efficiency (-6.9–-26.7).
Final
Mississippi Valley State logo
Mississippi Valley State
53—83
Florida A&M logo
Florida A&M
Florida A&M by 30 • 67.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATFlorida A&M
16-45FG26-55
36.0%FG%47.0%
5-153PT9-23
33.0%3PT%39.0%
16-24FT22-30
67.0%FT%73.0%
27Rebounds39
10Offensive Rebounds15
3Assists13
21Turnovers14
7Steals9
4Blocks7
21Fouls22

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Arthur TateGuard295-111-26-650100017
Kendal ParkerG243-92-63-311000011
Raeshun McGregoryGuard193-61-31-30101008
Alvin StredicForward380-40-06-98012006
Donovan SandersGuard272-60-10-01030004
Markell PetroGuard111-31-20-11000003
Greg Moore Jr.G91-20-00-02110002
Daniel UmohCenter61-10-00-00000002
George Ivory IIIG110-00-00-01000000
Moses HorneGuard110-10-00-22010000
Jair HortonF80-20-10-01000000
Antonio SiskG50-00-00-00001000
Jonathan PaceF20-00-00-00000000
Florida A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Milton Matthews IIIG318-156-111-151300023
Sterling YoungG266-132-53-524000017
Jordan ChatmanG283-50-14-550310010
Shaqir O'NealF153-41-23-362110010
Jocobi HendricksGuard142-40-04-43010008
Ja'Derryus EatmonForward171-20-02-41003004
Lenard Taylor Jr.G111-20-12-43000004
Jamine CharlesForward141-30-01-23102003
Roderick Coffee IIIF250-40-22-25310002
Saiyd BurnsideForward91-20-00-01100002
Trey LewisGuard100-10-10-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

67.9Possessions67.9
78.1Offensive Efficiency122.2
122.2Defensive Efficiency78.1
-44.2Net Efficiency44.2
41.1%Effective FG%55.5%
47.0%True Shooting %59.9%
31.2%Turnover Rate20.5%
53.3%Free Throw Rate54.5%
33.3%3-Point Rate41.8%
0.14Assist / Turnover0.93
Game Summary
Florida A&M won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 67.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.