
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.6%Arkansas-Pine Bluff
75.4%Bethune-Cookman
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBethune-Cookman -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL158.6
MODEL MONEYLINEBethune-Cookman -307

Bethune-Cookman
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArkansas-Pine Bluff 75
Projected Total158.6
Projected ScoreBethune-Cookman 83
Team Comparison
38.7MMH Power Index44.2
106.4Offensive Efficiency104.7
111.6Defensive Efficiency106.9
-5.2Net Efficiency-2.2
-6.0Strength of Schedule-3.3
1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.0
72.6Tempo72.0
51.4%Effective FG%51.9%
18.5%Turnover Rate19.2%
29.3%Offensive Rebound %30.3%
37.7%Free Throw Rate41.9%
-3.8Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Bethune-Cookman HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBethune-Cookman holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.2–38.7), defensive efficiency (106.9–111.6), net efficiency (-2.2–-5.2), strength of schedule (-3.3–-6.0).
Arkansas-Pine Bluff COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.4–104.7), ball security (18.5–19.2).