Yale

23-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.1%Yale

79.9%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL151.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -398

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreYale 71

Projected Total151.2

Projected ScorePurdue 80

Team Comparison

YaleMetricPurdue

65.4MMH Power Index73.2

121.4Offensive Efficiency124.8

105.8Defensive Efficiency107.8

15.6Net Efficiency17.0

1.6Strength of Schedule7.6

8.9Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

64.5Tempo65.4

56.8%Effective FG%57.8%

13.9%Turnover Rate13.7%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

34.4%Free Throw Rate29.1%

10.1Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–65.4), offensive efficiency (124.8–121.4), net efficiency (17.0–15.6), strength of schedule (7.6–1.6).

Yale COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.8–107.8), free throw rate (34.4–29.1).

Final

Yale

84—92

Purdue

Purdue by 8 • 72.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

YaleTEAM STATPurdue

33-65FG28-52

51.0%FG%54.0%

8-263PT11-23

31.0%3PT%48.0%

10-19FT25-32

53.0%FT%78.0%

31Rebounds31

11Offensive Rebounds5

21Assists17

10Turnovers10

2Steals7

1Blocks1

24Fouls18

Player Box Score

Yale

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
John Poulakidas	Guard	37	9-19	5-12	0-0	4	2	0	0	23
Samson Aletan	C	30	5-10	0-1	4-7	7	3	1	1	14
Bez Mbeng	Guard	34	4-8	1-4	3-6	5	5	0	0	12
Nick Townsend	F	29	5-9	0-2	2-4	3	4	1	0	12
Casey Simmons	G	14	5-6	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	10
Yassine Gharram	G	27	2-4	1-2	0-1	6	4	0	0	5
Jack Molloy	Forward	8	1-2	0-1	1-1	3	2	0	0	3
Jordan Brathwaite	G	4	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Isaac Celiscar	F	14	1-5	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Trevor Mullin	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braden Smith	G	35	7-16	4-8	4-4	9	6	5	0	22
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	30	5-8	0-0	7-9	3	3	1	0	17
Fletcher Loyer	G	26	5-7	2-2	2-2	0	3	0	0	14
C.J. Cox	G	16	3-5	0-2	6-7	2	2	0	0	12
Myles Colvin	G	24	3-5	2-4	1-2	5	0	1	0	9
Camden Heide	F	18	2-3	2-3	3-4	6	0	0	0	9
Gicarri Harris	G	19	2-5	1-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Will Berg	C	16	1-1	0-0	2-4	1	1	0	0	4
Raleigh Burgess	F	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Caleb Furst	Forward	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.6Possessions72.6

115.7Offensive Efficiency126.7

126.7Defensive Efficiency115.7

-11.0Net Efficiency11.0

56.9%Effective FG%64.4%

56.7%True Shooting %68.5%

13.7%Turnover Rate13.9%

29.2%Free Throw Rate61.5%

40.0%3-Point Rate44.2%

2.10Assist / Turnover1.70

Game Summary

Purdue won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 72.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.