
Kansas
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Kansas
56.3%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL148.0
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -129

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKansas 73
Projected Total148.0
Projected ScoreTCU 75
Team Comparison
62MMH Power Index59.7
109.2Offensive Efficiency110.2
100.3Defensive Efficiency102.7
8.9Net Efficiency7.5
8.9Strength of Schedule4.6
-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
68.8Tempo70.2
51.4%Effective FG%50.5%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.3%
29.0%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
33.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%
6.1Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kansas HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKansas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.0–59.7), defensive efficiency (100.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.9–7.5), strength of schedule (8.9–4.6).
TCU COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.2–109.2), recent form (2.2–-2.3), ball security (15.3–15.6).