Kentucky

22-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

25.6%Kentucky

74.4%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -8.1

PROJECTED TOTAL161.6

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -291

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKentucky 77

Projected Total161.6

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 85

Team Comparison

KentuckyMetricVanderbilt

63.9MMH Power Index68.9

115.2Offensive Efficiency120.9

106.3Defensive Efficiency105.7

8.9Net Efficiency15.2

8.7Strength of Schedule7.4

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.9Tempo70.9

53.2%Effective FG%55.3%

15.4%Turnover Rate13.5%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

38.0%Free Throw Rate39.3%

6.2Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–63.9), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–106.3), net efficiency (15.2–8.9).

Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (8.7–7.4), offensive rebounding (33.2–30.8).

Final

Kentucky

69—74

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 5 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

KentuckyTEAM STATVanderbilt

26-54FG29-66

48.0%FG%44.0%

9-233PT12-33

39.0%3PT%36.0%

8-13FT4-11

62.0%FT%36.0%

43Rebounds30

10Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists21

17Turnovers5

4Steals10

4Blocks3

10Fouls9

Player Box Score

Kentucky

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Otega Oweh	G	33	8-14	0-3	5-7	12	3	1	0	21
Ansley Almonor	Forward	24	4-5	4-5	0-0	4	0	0	0	12
Jaxson Robinson	Guard	31	4-8	3-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	11
Brandon Garrison	F	18	4-7	0-1	0-0	5	0	0	1	8
Lamont Butler	Guard	27	2-7	1-2	1-2	3	2	1	1	6
Amari Williams	Center	23	2-4	0-0	2-4	5	4	0	2	6
Koby Brea	Guard	22	1-5	1-4	0-0	4	0	1	0	3
Trent Noah	F	12	1-2	0-1	0-0	4	0	1	0	2
Travis Perry	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Collin Chandler	G	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Edwards	G	27	6-11	2-4	4-6	0	4	0	0	18
Devin McGlockton	F	27	6-10	2-5	0-0	6	2	2	1	14
Tyler Nickel	F	28	4-7	3-6	0-0	4	1	1	0	11
Jaylen Carey	F	17	4-7	2-4	0-2	6	0	1	0	10
Tyler Tanner	G	22	3-6	1-2	0-0	2	4	2	0	7
AJ Hoggard	Guard	25	2-8	1-3	0-1	3	6	1	0	5
MJ Collins Jr.	G	21	2-8	1-5	0-0	0	0	1	0	5
Chris Manon	Guard	21	2-8	0-3	0-2	3	3	1	2	4
Grant Huffman	Guard	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

102.7Offensive Efficiency110.1

110.1Defensive Efficiency102.7

-7.4Net Efficiency7.4

56.5%Effective FG%53.0%

57.3%True Shooting %51.9%

25.3%Turnover Rate7.4%

24.1%Free Throw Rate16.7%

42.6%3-Point Rate50.0%

0.65Assist / Turnover4.20

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.