Lamar logo

Lamar

12-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.3%Lamar
88.7%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -13.1
PROJECTED TOTAL148.3
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -785
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLamar 68
Projected Total148.3
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 81

Team Comparison

44.1MMH Power Index58
105.0Offensive Efficiency116.1
103.8Defensive Efficiency108.4
1.2Net Efficiency7.7
-3.0Strength of Schedule4.8
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
66.6Tempo69.1
48.8%Effective FG%53.5%
18.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
35.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
28.5%Free Throw Rate37.5%
0.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–44.1), offensive efficiency (116.1–105.0), net efficiency (7.7–1.2), strength of schedule (4.8–-3.0).
Lamar COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.8–108.4), offensive rebounding (35.5–31.7).
Final
Lamar logo
Lamar
71—97
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 26 • 72.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LamarTEAM STATTexas A&M
24-64FG32-58
38.0%FG%55.0%
6-183PT12-26
33.0%3PT%46.0%
17-25FT21-32
68.0%FT%66.0%
31Rebounds46
14Offensive Rebounds15
12Assists21
10Turnovers14
10Steals7
2Blocks6
21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Lamar
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alexis MarmolejosG296-141-410-1221200023
Ja'Sean JacksonGuard255-83-42-212300015
Andrew HolifieldF356-121-40-0100110013
B.B. KnightG152-91-41-22010006
Cody PennebakerG182-50-10-01120004
Danquez DawseyGuard191-70-11-21200003
Terrance Dixon Jr.F140-30-02-44000002
Braden EastF81-20-00-02100002
Adam HamiltonCenter71-20-00-12001002
Errol WhiteF170-00-01-22210001
Janko BulajicC130-20-00-01300000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zhuric PhelpsGuard286-91-23-447300016
Andersson GarciaForward275-72-23-593110015
Wade Taylor IVGuard255-83-62-243100015
Henry Coleman IIIForward165-70-03-671100013
CJ WilcherGuard153-53-50-01000009
Manny ObasekiGuard142-40-04-63300008
Solomon WashingtonF201-41-34-54101007
Hayden HefnerGuard122-72-60-01100006
Pharrel PayneF241-30-02-47003004
Jace CarterNot Available142-40-20-03110004
Chris McDermottF30-00-00-00000000
Jaelyn LeeG20-00-00-01101000

Advanced Game Stats

72.1Possessions72.1
98.5Offensive Efficiency134.5
134.5Defensive Efficiency98.5
-36.1Net Efficiency36.1
42.2%Effective FG%65.5%
46.8%True Shooting %66.3%
13.9%Turnover Rate19.4%
39.1%Free Throw Rate55.2%
28.1%3-Point Rate44.8%
1.20Assist / Turnover1.50
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 72.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.