Memphis

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.0%Memphis

53.0%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulane -1.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.8

MODEL MONEYLINETulane -113

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMemphis 75

Projected Total151.8

Projected ScoreTulane 76

Team Comparison

MemphisMetricTulane

47.8MMH Power Index44.3

104.6Offensive Efficiency105.3

106.5Defensive Efficiency109.9

-1.9Net Efficiency-4.6

4.4Strength of Schedule2.7

-11.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.9Tempo68.7

48.7%Effective FG%49.6%

18.9%Turnover Rate15.6%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

35.1%Free Throw Rate44.8%

-1.4Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Memphis HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMemphis holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.8–44.3), defensive efficiency (106.5–109.9), net efficiency (-1.9–-4.6), strength of schedule (4.4–2.7).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.3–104.6), recent form (-10.3–-11.1), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.7).

Final

Memphis

68—56

Tulane

Memphis by 12 • 65.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MemphisTEAM STATTulane

26-58FG21-58

45.0%FG%36.0%

9-233PT4-24

39.0%3PT%17.0%

7-10FT10-17

70.0%FT%59.0%

37Rebounds38

8Offensive Rebounds13

18Assists15

11Turnovers12

4Steals5

2Blocks4

16Fouls11

Player Box Score

Memphis

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dain Dainja	Forward	35	8-11	0-0	3-4	10	3	0	0	19
Colby Rogers	Guard	26	4-11	4-8	2-2	5	1	0	0	14
PJ Carter	G	26	5-11	4-9	0-0	3	0	0	0	14
P.J. Haggerty	G	37	3-11	0-3	2-2	4	5	0	1	8
Tyrese Hunter	Guard	38	3-8	1-3	0-2	3	5	2	0	7
Moussa Cisse	Center	13	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	0	1	0	4
Nick Jourdain	Forward	19	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	1	2
Dante Harris	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	40	5-14	3-9	6-7	7	4	1	0	19
Kaleb Banks	F	33	6-13	0-3	2-5	5	3	1	2	14
Mari Jordan	G	21	3-7	0-2	1-2	2	0	0	1	7
Asher Woods	G	28	2-9	1-4	0-0	7	3	1	0	5
Gregg Glenn III	F	32	2-5	0-2	0-0	4	3	1	0	4
Percy Daniels	C	8	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	3
Kam Williams	G	28	1-7	0-3	0-1	2	2	1	1	2
Tyler Ringgold	F	8	1-2	0-1	0-0	5	0	0	0	2
KJ Greene	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4

104.0Offensive Efficiency85.6

85.6Defensive Efficiency104.0

18.3Net Efficiency-18.3

52.6%Effective FG%39.7%

54.2%True Shooting %42.4%

16.7%Turnover Rate18.4%

17.2%Free Throw Rate29.3%

39.7%3-Point Rate41.4%

1.64Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Memphis won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.