Florida

27-8

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

67.4%Florida

32.6%Tennessee

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida -3.8

PROJECTED TOTAL156.3

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida -207

Tennessee

25-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida 80

Projected Total156.3

Projected ScoreTennessee 76

Team Comparison

FloridaMetricTennessee

79.7MMH Power Index68.6

120.9Offensive Efficiency115.8

99.3Defensive Efficiency102.1

21.6Net Efficiency13.7

7.1Strength of Schedule7.8

24.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

72.0Tempo68.1

54.2%Effective FG%51.6%

16.3%Turnover Rate17.3%

42.8%Offensive Rebound %44.5%

39.8%Free Throw Rate38.6%

15.6Average Margin9.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.7–68.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–115.8), defensive efficiency (99.3–102.1), net efficiency (21.6–13.7).

Tennessee COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.8–7.1), offensive rebounding (44.5–42.8).

Final

Florida

44—64

Tennessee

Tennessee by 20 • 63.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

FloridaTEAM STATTennessee

13-53FG24-60

25.0%FG%40.0%

4-273PT6-22

15.0%3PT%27.0%

14-19FT10-15

74.0%FT%67.0%

37Rebounds40

10Offensive Rebounds12

5Assists15

13Turnovers7

6Steals7

5Blocks7

13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Florida

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Walter Clayton Jr.	Guard	27	3-13	2-9	2-2	2	0	1	0	10
Denzel Aberdeen	G	24	1-6	0-3	6-8	1	0	1	0	8
Alijah Martin	Guard	34	2-12	2-9	0-0	3	0	1	0	6
Thomas Haugh	F	25	1-6	0-3	4-5	10	1	0	0	6
Sam Alexis	F	15	3-6	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Alex Condon	F	22	1-6	0-1	2-4	5	1	2	2	4
Will Richard	Guard	33	1-2	0-1	0-0	5	2	1	2	2
Rueben Chinyelu	C	18	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	2
Isaiah Brown	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Tennessee

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chaz Lanier	Guard	36	6-14	5-9	2-2	5	0	1	0	19
Jordan Gainey	Guard	37	5-13	1-5	5-6	4	5	3	0	16
Felix Okpara	F	26	4-5	0-0	2-2	8	0	0	2	10
Jahmai Mashack	Guard	36	4-10	0-1	0-0	8	4	2	1	8
Cade Phillips	F	28	3-5	0-1	1-3	3	0	0	3	7
Darlinstone Dubar	Guard	26	2-10	0-4	0-2	5	3	0	1	4
Bishop Boswell	G	11	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	3	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.6Possessions63.6

69.2Offensive Efficiency100.6

100.6Defensive Efficiency69.2

-31.4Net Efficiency31.4

28.3%Effective FG%45.0%

35.5%True Shooting %47.7%

20.0%Turnover Rate11.3%

35.8%Free Throw Rate25.0%

50.9%3-Point Rate36.7%

0.38Assist / Turnover2.14

Game Summary

Tennessee won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 63.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.