Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

64.2%Texas A&M

35.8%South Carolina

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -3.2

PROJECTED TOTAL156.1

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -179

South Carolina

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 80

Projected Total156.1

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina 76

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricSouth Carolina

58MMH Power Index48.2

116.1Offensive Efficiency109.0

108.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

7.7Net Efficiency-2.2

4.8Strength of Schedule5.2

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.4

69.1Tempo68.8

53.5%Effective FG%50.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.5%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

37.5%Free Throw Rate37.1%

5.3Average Margin-1.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–48.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.0), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.2), net efficiency (7.7–-2.2).

South Carolina COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–4.8), ball security (14.5–14.8).

Final

Texas A&M

76—72

South Carolina

Texas A&M by 4 • 65.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATSouth Carolina

22-49FG25-56

45.0%FG%45.0%

11-233PT12-31

48.0%3PT%39.0%

21-30FT10-12

70.0%FT%83.0%

32Rebounds29

9Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists19

10Turnovers12

6Steals7

2Blocks4

11Fouls20

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	27	7-11	7-10	4-6	2	2	1	0	25
Henry Coleman III	Forward	30	4-6	0-0	4-4	8	1	2	0	12
Zhuric Phelps	Guard	29	1-9	0-3	7-8	6	3	0	0	9
Pharrel Payne	F	30	4-8	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	1	8
Manny Obaseki	Guard	24	1-3	1-1	4-6	1	1	0	0	7
Andersson Garcia	Forward	21	1-4	1-4	2-4	5	1	1	1	5
CJ Wilcher	Guard	10	2-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	5
Hayden Hefner	Guard	11	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jace Carter	Not Available	18	1-2	0-1	0-2	4	0	2	0	2

South Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Collin Murray-Boyles	Forward	36	11-16	0-1	0-0	7	6	2	2	22
Jamarii Thomas	Guard	35	4-13	3-8	4-4	5	5	2	0	15
Zach Davis	G	32	3-9	3-8	3-4	6	4	1	0	12
Morris Ugusuk	G	18	4-8	4-7	0-0	0	1	1	0	12
Nick Pringle	F	21	1-2	0-0	3-4	3	0	0	0	5
Jacobi Wright	Guard	33	1-6	1-6	0-0	5	2	1	0	3
Jordan Butler	F	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	2	3
Benjamin Bosmans-Verdonk	Forward	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Arden Conyers	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.0Possessions65.0

116.9Offensive Efficiency110.8

110.8Defensive Efficiency116.9

6.2Net Efficiency-6.2

56.1%Effective FG%55.4%

60.1%True Shooting %58.3%

15.6%Turnover Rate18.3%

61.2%Free Throw Rate21.4%

46.9%3-Point Rate55.4%

0.90Assist / Turnover1.58

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 65.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.