USC

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.6%USC

96.4%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -20.5

PROJECTED TOTAL157.7

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -2678

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUSC 69

Projected Total157.7

Projected ScorePurdue 89

Team Comparison

USCMetricPurdue

48.3MMH Power Index73.2

108.5Offensive Efficiency124.8

107.6Defensive Efficiency107.8

0.9Net Efficiency17.0

2.5Strength of Schedule7.6

-16.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

72.4Tempo65.4

50.7%Effective FG%57.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate13.7%

33.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

45.3%Free Throw Rate29.1%

0.7Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–48.3), offensive efficiency (124.8–108.5), net efficiency (17.0–0.9), strength of schedule (7.6–2.5).

USC COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–107.8), free throw rate (45.3–29.1).

Final

USC

72—90

Purdue

Purdue by 18 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

USCTEAM STATPurdue

26-63FG33-66

41.0%FG%50.0%

4-263PT6-26

15.0%3PT%23.0%

16-29FT18-26

55.0%FT%69.0%

31Rebounds48

12Offensive Rebounds17

10Assists19

10Turnovers10

6Steals8

5Blocks2

23Fouls24

Player Box Score

USC

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wesley Yates III	G	32	11-22	2-6	6-9	4	2	2	0	30
Isaiah Elohim	G	15	4-4	1-1	2-4	2	0	1	0	11
Jalen Shelley	F	19	3-6	1-4	3-5	6	2	0	4	10
Clark Slajchert	Guard	26	2-10	0-6	3-5	4	1	0	0	7
Chibuzo Agbo	Guard	25	2-7	0-3	0-1	2	0	1	0	4
Josh Cohen	Forward	11	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	4
Bryce Pope	Guard	16	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Rashaun Agee	F	10	1-3	0-1	0-1	2	1	0	0	2
Kevin Patton Jr.	G	4	0-2	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Saint Thomas	Forward	35	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	3	2	0	0
Matt Knowling	Forward	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Harrison Hornery	Forward	3	0-1	0-1	0-2	1	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	30	8-12	0-0	8-9	10	1	1	2	24
Fletcher Loyer	G	23	5-11	2-7	2-3	2	1	0	0	14
Braden Smith	G	35	4-11	0-4	1-2	3	13	5	0	9
Caleb Furst	Forward	26	4-4	0-0	1-3	10	0	0	0	9
C.J. Cox	G	24	2-3	2-3	2-3	6	0	0	0	8
Myles Colvin	G	17	3-11	2-8	0-0	5	1	2	0	8
Raleigh Burgess	F	8	3-4	0-1	2-3	2	0	0	0	8
Gicarri Harris	G	15	3-5	0-2	1-1	0	3	0	0	7
Camden Heide	F	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Brian Waddell	F	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Sam King	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Will Berg	C	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Josh Furst	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jack Lusk	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jace Rayl	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

98.5Offensive Efficiency123.1

123.1Defensive Efficiency98.5

-24.6Net Efficiency24.6

44.4%Effective FG%54.5%

46.9%True Shooting %57.4%

13.4%Turnover Rate14.0%

46.0%Free Throw Rate39.4%

41.3%3-Point Rate39.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Purdue won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.