Duke

35-3

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

87.2%Duke

12.8%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADDuke -11.1

PROJECTED TOTAL140.4

MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -681

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDuke 76

Projected Total140.4

Projected ScoreClemson 65

Team Comparison

DukeMetricClemson

81.7MMH Power Index59.9

122.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

95.2Defensive Efficiency101.4

27.0Net Efficiency11.2

7.8Strength of Schedule4.6

18.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

66.8Tempo63.6

56.9%Effective FG%53.0%

15.9%Turnover Rate14.0%

38.2%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

39.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%

18.0Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Duke HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–59.9), offensive efficiency (122.2–112.6), defensive efficiency (95.2–101.4), net efficiency (27.0–11.2).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHball security (14.0–15.9).

Final

Duke

71—77

Clemson

Clemson by 6 • 62.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DukeTEAM STATClemson

24-55FG30-51

44.0%FG%59.0%

12-243PT4-10

50.0%3PT%40.0%

11-14FT13-22

79.0%FT%59.0%

23Rebounds36

8Offensive Rebounds11

9Assists13

9Turnovers12

8Steals4

2Blocks5

23Fouls16

Player Box Score

Duke

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyrese Proctor	Guard	39	9-15	4-8	1-1	2	1	2	0	23
Cooper Flagg	Forward	38	6-17	3-6	3-4	5	1	3	1	18
Kon Knueppel	Guard	32	5-9	4-6	0-0	3	1	1	0	14
Sion James	Guard	32	2-5	0-1	4-5	3	5	0	0	8
Khaman Maluach	Center	20	0-2	0-0	3-4	5	0	0	1	3
Isaiah Evans	G	14	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Maliq Brown	F	20	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	2	0	2
Caleb Foster	G	3	0-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Patrick Ngongba II	C	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Viktor Lakhin	Center	27	9-12	0-0	4-6	4	2	0	3	22
Chase Hunter	Guard	34	5-8	0-1	4-5	7	3	0	1	14
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	40	5-9	1-1	1-2	1	1	0	0	12
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	36	5-7	1-1	1-4	10	2	0	1	12
Dillon Hunter	G	23	3-4	1-2	0-1	2	2	1	0	7
Del Jones	G	16	2-6	1-2	0-0	1	2	0	0	5
Christian Reeves	C	5	1-2	0-0	3-4	3	0	0	0	5
Chauncey Wiggins	F	11	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Jake Heidbreder	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	2	0	0
Myles Foster	Forward	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.6Possessions62.6

113.4Offensive Efficiency123.0

123.0Defensive Efficiency113.4

-9.6Net Efficiency9.6

54.5%Effective FG%62.7%

57.6%True Shooting %62.7%

14.4%Turnover Rate19.2%

25.5%Free Throw Rate43.1%

43.6%3-Point Rate19.6%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Clemson won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 62.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.