North Carolina logo

North Carolina

24-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.0%North Carolina
48.0%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL144.1
MODEL MONEYLINENorth Carolina -108
Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNorth Carolina 72
Projected Total144.1
Projected ScoreClemson 72

Team Comparison

65.2MMH Power Index59.9
115.5Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.8Defensive Efficiency101.4
11.7Net Efficiency11.2
7.6Strength of Schedule4.6
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.0Tempo63.6
54.6%Effective FG%53.0%
13.9%Turnover Rate14.0%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
38.1%Free Throw Rate38.1%
8.1Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

North Carolina HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNorth Carolina holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.2–59.9), offensive efficiency (115.5–112.6), net efficiency (11.7–11.2), strength of schedule (7.6–4.6).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–103.8).
Final
North Carolina logo
North Carolina
65—85
Clemson logo
Clemson
Clemson by 20 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North CarolinaTEAM STATClemson
28-62FG32-64
45.0%FG%50.0%
4-193PT12-25
21.0%3PT%48.0%
5-11FT9-12
45.0%FT%75.0%
28Rebounds41
10Offensive Rebounds15
13Assists17
13Turnovers15
8Steals8
5Blocks9
14Fouls12

Player Box Score

North Carolina
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
RJ DavisGuard338-142-50-022200018
Seth TrimbleG305-110-22-341310012
Elliot CadeauG315-101-30-216000011
Ven-Allen LubinF224-50-00-06000008
Jae'Lyn WithersForward172-41-20-03100005
Drake PowellGuard262-60-30-23311004
Ian JacksonG160-80-33-42021003
Jalen WashingtonC111-10-00-01002002
Cade TysonG51-20-10-01000002
Ty ClaudeForward60-10-00-02000000
James BrownF30-00-00-01000000
Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Viktor LakhinCenter259-164-50-060150022
Chase HunterGuard297-134-81-212120019
Jaeden ZackeryNot Available336-91-33-577400016
Chauncey WigginsF163-51-22-25001009
Dillon HunterG322-42-30-03311006
Ian SchieffelinForward312-60-11-110310005
Jake HeidbrederG172-60-20-02200004
Myles FosterForward51-20-02-24000004
Del JonesG50-10-00-00000000
Asa ThomasG20-10-00-00000000
Jackson RobertsForward10-00-00-00000000
Daniel NauseefForward10-00-00-00000000
Christian ReevesC10-00-00-00000000
Andrew LatiffGuard10-00-00-00000000
Matt KellyGuard10-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0
92.9Offensive Efficiency121.4
121.4Defensive Efficiency92.9
-28.6Net Efficiency28.6
48.4%Effective FG%59.4%
48.3%True Shooting %61.0%
18.5%Turnover Rate21.5%
17.7%Free Throw Rate18.8%
30.6%3-Point Rate39.1%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.13
Game Summary
Clemson won by 20 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.