
Auburn
21-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Auburn
73.3%Vanderbilt
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL166.0
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -275

Vanderbilt
27-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAuburn 79
Projected Total166.0
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 87
Team Comparison
64.4MMH Power Index68.9
118.8Offensive Efficiency120.9
113.0Defensive Efficiency105.7
5.8Net Efficiency15.2
7.5Strength of Schedule7.4
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7
69.8Tempo70.9
53.1%Effective FG%55.3%
14.5%Turnover Rate13.5%
36.5%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
43.8%Free Throw Rate39.3%
4.1Average Margin10.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–64.4), offensive efficiency (120.9–118.8), defensive efficiency (105.7–113.0), net efficiency (15.2–5.8).
Auburn COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.5–7.4), recent form (8.0–2.7), offensive rebounding (36.5–30.8).