
Kent State
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
16.9%Kent State
83.1%Auburn
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAuburn -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL168.1
MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -492

Auburn
21-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 79
Projected Total168.1
Projected ScoreAuburn 89
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index64.4
113.9Offensive Efficiency118.8
107.6Defensive Efficiency113.0
6.3Net Efficiency5.8
-0.1Strength of Schedule7.5
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0
74.0Tempo69.8
53.0%Effective FG%53.1%
17.7%Turnover Rate14.5%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %36.5%
43.5%Free Throw Rate43.8%
4.7Average Margin4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Auburn HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–54.7), offensive efficiency (118.8–113.9), strength of schedule (7.5–-0.1), recent form (8.0–2.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–113.0), net efficiency (6.3–5.8), average scoring margin (4.7–4.1).