
Montana
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.3%Montana
95.7%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -19.5
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -2226

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMontana 66
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreTennessee 86
Team Comparison
45.4MMH Power Index68.6
108.6Offensive Efficiency115.8
104.8Defensive Efficiency102.1
3.8Net Efficiency13.7
-2.4Strength of Schedule7.8
-6.5Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
71.2Tempo68.1
56.3%Effective FG%51.6%
19.2%Turnover Rate17.3%
21.9%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
37.7%Free Throw Rate38.6%
2.7Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–45.4), offensive efficiency (115.8–108.6), defensive efficiency (102.1–104.8), net efficiency (13.7–3.8).
Montana COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (56.3–51.6).