Ohio logo

Ohio

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.2%Ohio
77.8%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -9.6
PROJECTED TOTAL164.7
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -350
Kent State logo

Kent State

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOhio 78
Projected Total164.7
Projected ScoreKent State 87

Team Comparison

48MMH Power Index54.7
109.7Offensive Efficiency113.9
110.7Defensive Efficiency107.6
-1.0Net Efficiency6.3
-0.1Strength of Schedule-0.1
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
71.0Tempo74.0
52.0%Effective FG%53.0%
15.3%Turnover Rate17.7%
28.9%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
37.8%Free Throw Rate43.5%
-0.7Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Kent State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–48.0), offensive efficiency (113.9–109.7), defensive efficiency (107.6–110.7), net efficiency (6.3–-1.0).
Ohio COUNTERS WITHball security (15.3–17.7).
Final
Ohio logo
Ohio
75—76
Kent State logo
Kent State
Kent State by 1 • 66.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OhioTEAM STATKent State
27-52FG25-54
52.0%FG%46.0%
11-263PT6-17
42.0%3PT%35.0%
10-13FT20-23
77.0%FT%87.0%
21Rebounds34
3Offensive Rebounds11
15Assists10
11Turnovers13
6Steals8
1Blocks—
18Fouls16

Player Box Score

Ohio
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Shereef MitchellGuard329-144-63-323400025
Jackson PaveletzkeG385-71-21-125000012
Elmore James IVG234-92-52-211000012
AJ BrownG293-73-60-01010009
Vic SearlsForward213-40-01-26100007
Elijah ElliottG271-50-23-56510005
AJ ClaytonForward192-51-40-01001005
Ajay SheldonG110-10-10-00000000
Kent State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cian MedleyG298-132-66-612200024
Jalen SullingerGuard345-92-46-641100018
VonCameron DavisForward343-122-42-243200010
Jamal SumlinG275-80-00-021100010
Delrecco GillespieF332-60-05-712010009
Cli'Ron HornbeakCenter142-20-01-22110005
Marquis BarnettNot Available190-20-10-05100000
Mike BekeljaGuard100-20-20-03100000

Advanced Game Stats

66.6Possessions66.6
112.6Offensive Efficiency114.1
114.1Defensive Efficiency112.6
-1.5Net Efficiency1.5
62.5%Effective FG%51.9%
64.5%True Shooting %58.5%
16.6%Turnover Rate19.4%
25.0%Free Throw Rate42.6%
50.0%3-Point Rate31.5%
1.36Assist / Turnover0.77
Game Summary
Kent State won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 66.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.