Wisconsin

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.6%Wisconsin

81.4%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -9.8

PROJECTED TOTAL159.0

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -438

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWisconsin 75

Projected Total159.0

Projected ScorePurdue 84

Team Comparison

WisconsinMetricPurdue

64.5MMH Power Index73.2

118.6Offensive Efficiency124.8

108.8Defensive Efficiency107.8

9.8Net Efficiency17.0

6.7Strength of Schedule7.6

5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.9Tempo65.4

54.6%Effective FG%57.8%

12.8%Turnover Rate13.7%

28.7%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

32.5%Free Throw Rate29.1%

6.9Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–64.5), offensive efficiency (124.8–118.6), defensive efficiency (107.8–108.8), net efficiency (17.0–9.8).

Wisconsin COUNTERS WITHball security (12.8–13.7), free throw rate (32.5–29.1).

Final

Wisconsin

94—84

Purdue

Wisconsin by 10 • 65.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WisconsinTEAM STATPurdue

32-52FG29-56

62.0%FG%52.0%

12-303PT10-22

40.0%3PT%45.0%

18-24FT16-21

75.0%FT%76.0%

23Rebounds25

2Offensive Rebounds4

18Assists21

3Turnovers4

2Steals2

4Blocks—

14Fouls21

Player Box Score

Wisconsin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
John Tonje	Guard	34	10-15	4-9	8-9	6	3	0	1	32
Max Klesmit	Guard	33	5-10	1-6	6-7	2	6	1	0	17
Nolan Winter	F	28	4-7	2-5	2-4	5	0	1	0	12
John Blackwell	G	28	5-8	1-3	0-2	4	2	0	0	11
Jack Janicki	G	17	4-6	3-4	0-0	1	2	0	1	11
Kamari McGee	Guard	8	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Steve Crowl	Forward	20	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	3	0	0	3
Carter Gilmore	Forward	24	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	2	2
Xavier Amos	F	8	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	37	12-16	0-0	6-9	4	5	1	30
Fletcher Loyer	G	28	4-8	2-4	5-6	4	1	0	15
C.J. Cox	G	27	4-8	3-6	2-2	6	1	1	13
Myles Colvin	G	18	3-7	3-5	0-0	1	0	0	9
Braden Smith	G	40	2-10	0-2	2-2	5	12	0	6
Caleb Furst	Forward	24	2-2	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	5
Camden Heide	F	16	1-3	1-3	0-0	2	2	0	3
Gicarri Harris	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	3
Raleigh Burgess	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2

144.2Offensive Efficiency128.8

128.8Defensive Efficiency144.2

15.3Net Efficiency-15.3

73.1%Effective FG%60.7%

74.1%True Shooting %63.7%

4.7%Turnover Rate6.1%

46.2%Free Throw Rate37.5%

57.7%3-Point Rate39.3%

6.00Assist / Turnover5.25

Game Summary

Wisconsin won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.