
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.2%Tennessee
33.8%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL154.2
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -196

Texas A&M
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 79
Projected Total154.2
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index58
115.8Offensive Efficiency116.1
102.1Defensive Efficiency108.4
13.7Net Efficiency7.7
7.8Strength of Schedule4.8
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
68.1Tempo69.1
51.6%Effective FG%53.5%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.8%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
38.6%Free Throw Rate37.5%
9.3Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–58.0), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.4), net efficiency (13.7–7.7), strength of schedule (7.8–4.8).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.8), shooting efficiency (53.5–51.6), ball security (14.8–17.3).