
Clemson
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
31.0%Clemson
69.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL150.5
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -223

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 73
Projected Total150.5
Projected ScoreSMU 78
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index62.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency118.2
101.4Defensive Efficiency109.6
11.2Net Efficiency8.6
4.6Strength of Schedule7.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
63.6Tempo71.1
53.0%Effective FG%55.7%
14.0%Turnover Rate15.7%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
38.1%Free Throw Rate31.3%
7.2Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.2–112.6), strength of schedule (7.0–4.6), recent form (-1.3–-4.7).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–109.6), net efficiency (11.2–8.6), ball security (14.0–15.7).