Ole Miss

15-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

9.3%Ole Miss

90.7%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -16.2

PROJECTED TOTAL159.9

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -975

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreOle Miss 72

Projected Total159.9

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 88

Team Comparison

Ole MissMetricVanderbilt

53MMH Power Index68.9

109.2Offensive Efficiency120.9

109.5Defensive Efficiency105.7

-0.3Net Efficiency15.2

5.4Strength of Schedule7.4

-2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

69.5Tempo70.9

50.6%Effective FG%55.3%

14.0%Turnover Rate13.5%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

33.8%Free Throw Rate39.3%

-0.2Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–53.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.5), net efficiency (15.2–-0.3).

Final

Ole Miss

72—77

Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt by 5 • 67.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Ole MissTEAM STATVanderbilt

25-60FG24-52

42.0%FG%46.0%

9-283PT8-23

32.0%3PT%35.0%

13-15FT21-29

87.0%FT%72.0%

30Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds11

11Assists14

11Turnovers13

8Steals9

6Blocks6

21Fouls14

Player Box Score

Ole Miss

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malik Dia	F	30	8-12	2-4	4-5	7	1	1	2	22
Sean Pedulla	Guard	37	7-14	3-8	4-4	6	4	1	0	21
Jaylen Murray	Guard	33	4-13	2-8	0-0	3	5	2	0	10
Dre Davis	Guard	26	2-7	2-3	3-4	3	0	2	1	9
Jaemyn Brakefield	Forward	26	3-6	0-2	2-2	6	0	0	0	8
Matthew Murrell	Guard	12	1-5	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Eduardo Klafke	G	22	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	2	2	0
Davon Barnes	Not Available	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Mikeal Brown-Jones	Forward	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chris Manon	Guard	21	4-5	2-2	6-8	7	1	4	3	16
Jason Edwards	G	27	4-13	2-8	5-6	2	1	0	0	15
Tyler Nickel	F	26	4-7	3-6	2-2	3	2	0	1	13
Devin McGlockton	F	34	3-7	0-2	4-6	8	2	1	0	10
MJ Collins Jr.	G	19	2-5	1-3	2-2	0	0	0	0	7
Jaylen Carey	F	16	3-4	0-0	1-2	4	0	1	1	7
Tyler Tanner	G	18	3-4	0-1	0-1	4	1	1	0	6
AJ Hoggard	Guard	25	1-6	0-1	0-0	3	5	0	1	2
Grant Huffman	Guard	14	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	2	2	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

67.9Possessions67.9

106.0Offensive Efficiency113.4

113.4Defensive Efficiency106.0

-7.4Net Efficiency7.4

49.2%Effective FG%53.8%

53.6%True Shooting %58.5%

16.1%Turnover Rate19.2%

25.0%Free Throw Rate55.8%

46.7%3-Point Rate44.2%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 67.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.