
Tennessee
25-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.9%Tennessee
25.1%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.1
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -298

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee 82
Projected Total157.1
Projected ScoreLSU 75
Team Comparison
68.6MMH Power Index54.2
115.8Offensive Efficiency115.5
102.1Defensive Efficiency111.3
13.7Net Efficiency4.2
7.8Strength of Schedule4.5
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
68.1Tempo70.5
51.6%Effective FG%53.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.6%
44.5%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
38.6%Free Throw Rate41.9%
9.3Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–54.2), offensive efficiency (115.8–115.5), defensive efficiency (102.1–111.3), net efficiency (13.7–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.4–51.6), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (41.9–38.6).