
Vanderbilt
27-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.9%Vanderbilt
33.1%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL161.8
MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -202

Texas A&M
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVanderbilt 83
Projected Total161.8
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 79
Team Comparison
68.9MMH Power Index58
120.9Offensive Efficiency116.1
105.7Defensive Efficiency108.4
15.2Net Efficiency7.7
7.4Strength of Schedule4.8
2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
70.9Tempo69.1
55.3%Effective FG%53.5%
13.5%Turnover Rate14.8%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
39.3%Free Throw Rate37.5%
10.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–58.0), offensive efficiency (120.9–116.1), defensive efficiency (105.7–108.4), net efficiency (15.2–7.7).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.7–30.8).