Notre Dame

13-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.2%Notre Dame

83.8%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -11.9

PROJECTED TOTAL143.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -517

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 66

Projected Total143.6

Projected ScoreClemson 78

Team Comparison

Notre DameMetricClemson

49.7MMH Power Index59.9

110.3Offensive Efficiency112.6

111.2Defensive Efficiency101.4

-0.9Net Efficiency11.2

4.7Strength of Schedule4.6

-11.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

68.0Tempo63.6

53.0%Effective FG%53.0%

17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-0.6Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–49.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.3), defensive efficiency (101.4–111.2), net efficiency (11.2–-0.9).

Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.7–4.6), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0).

Final

Notre Dame

68—83

Clemson

Clemson by 15 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Notre DameTEAM STATClemson

22-49FG30-63

45.0%FG%48.0%

5-163PT9-23

31.0%3PT%39.0%

19-21FT14-18

90.0%FT%78.0%

32Rebounds31

7Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists23

10Turnovers4

—Steals5

1Blocks2

15Fouls18

Player Box Score

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	BLK	PTS
Markus Burton	G	36	8-19	2-4	12-13	4	5	0	30
Tae Davis	F	33	6-12	2-3	1-2	5	0	0	15
J.R. Konieczny	F	34	4-6	0-2	0-0	7	1	0	8
Logan Imes	G	14	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	1	0	5
Kebba Njie	F	24	1-3	0-1	2-2	4	0	0	4
Sir Mohammed	G	17	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	3	0	2
Garrett Sundra	F	17	0-1	0-1	2-2	3	0	0	2
Cole Certa	G	17	0-3	0-3	2-2	0	0	1	2
Julian Roper II	Guard	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
Burke Chebuhar	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	32	9-11	2-2	4-4	9	3	2	0	24
Viktor Lakhin	Center	27	8-17	1-6	1-3	5	5	0	2	18
Jake Heidbreder	G	24	4-7	4-7	2-2	1	2	1	0	14
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	34	5-10	0-2	1-1	3	2	0	0	11
Chase Hunter	Guard	23	2-6	1-2	3-5	2	5	0	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	33	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	5	1	0	3
Myles Foster	Forward	4	1-2	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	3
Chauncey Wiggins	F	16	0-5	0-1	2-2	2	1	1	0	2
Del Jones	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Asa Thomas	G	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

106.6Offensive Efficiency130.1

130.1Defensive Efficiency106.6

-23.5Net Efficiency23.5

50.0%Effective FG%54.8%

57.7%True Shooting %58.0%

16.1%Turnover Rate6.1%

42.9%Free Throw Rate28.6%

32.7%3-Point Rate36.5%

1.00Assist / Turnover5.75

Game Summary

Clemson won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.