UCLA

24-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.2%UCLA

83.8%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -11.1

PROJECTED TOTAL152.2

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -517

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUCLA 71

Projected Total152.2

Projected ScorePurdue 82

Team Comparison

UCLAMetricPurdue

63MMH Power Index73.2

115.9Offensive Efficiency124.8

106.9Defensive Efficiency107.8

9.0Net Efficiency17.0

5.1Strength of Schedule7.6

8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

66.5Tempo65.4

53.5%Effective FG%57.8%

13.4%Turnover Rate13.7%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

33.8%Free Throw Rate29.1%

6.0Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–63.0), offensive efficiency (124.8–115.9), net efficiency (17.0–9.0), strength of schedule (7.6–5.1).

UCLA COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.9–107.8), ball security (13.4–13.7), free throw rate (33.8–29.1).

Final

UCLA

66—76

Purdue

Purdue by 10 • 60.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UCLATEAM STATPurdue

24-50FG27-52

48.0%FG%52.0%

5-183PT11-22

28.0%3PT%50.0%

13-16FT11-16

81.0%FT%69.0%

31Rebounds23

12Offensive Rebounds7

19Assists14

14Turnovers9

4Steals9

2Blocks1

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

UCLA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Bilodeau	F	30	7-13	0-1	1-1	7	2	1	0	15
Sebastian Mack	G	24	4-4	2-2	0-0	4	2	1	0	10
Eric Dailey Jr.	G	25	3-6	0-1	3-4	3	3	1	0	9
Dylan Andrews	G	29	3-7	1-4	0-0	2	4	0	0	7
Lazar Stefanovic	Guard	18	2-10	1-7	2-2	5	1	0	0	7
Aday Mara	C	6	2-2	0-0	2-3	1	0	0	0	6
Kobe Johnson	Guard	28	2-3	1-1	0-0	3	5	0	1	5
Trent Perry	G	12	0-1	0-0	4-4	3	1	0	0	4
William Kyle III	F	5	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	1	3
Skyy Clark	G	23	0-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	38	11-15	0-0	7-10	3	0	3	1	29
Braden Smith	G	39	8-17	6-10	1-2	3	8	4	0	23
Fletcher Loyer	G	33	3-6	3-5	2-2	1	2	0	0	11
C.J. Cox	G	20	2-6	0-2	1-2	3	2	1	0	5
Myles Colvin	G	20	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Camden Heide	F	21	1-2	1-2	0-0	9	1	0	0	3
Caleb Furst	Forward	19	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Gicarri Harris	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Raleigh Burgess	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.6Possessions60.6

108.9Offensive Efficiency125.4

125.4Defensive Efficiency108.9

-16.5Net Efficiency16.5

53.0%Effective FG%62.5%

57.3%True Shooting %63.8%

23.5%Turnover Rate14.6%

32.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%

36.0%3-Point Rate42.3%

1.36Assist / Turnover1.56

Game Summary

Purdue won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 60.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.