Auburn logo

Auburn

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.1%Auburn
44.9%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL162.5
MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -123
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAuburn 81
Projected Total162.5
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 82

Team Comparison

64.4MMH Power Index58
118.8Offensive Efficiency116.1
113.0Defensive Efficiency108.4
5.8Net Efficiency7.7
7.5Strength of Schedule4.8
8.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
69.8Tempo69.1
53.1%Effective FG%53.5%
14.5%Turnover Rate14.8%
36.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
43.8%Free Throw Rate37.5%
4.1Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–58.0), offensive efficiency (118.8–116.1), strength of schedule (7.5–4.8), recent form (8.0–-7.2).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–113.0), net efficiency (7.7–5.8), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.1).
Final
Auburn logo
Auburn
72—83
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 11 • 62.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AuburnTEAM STATTexas A&M
25-50FG28-65
50.0%FG%43.0%
9-223PT9-25
41.0%3PT%36.0%
13-15FT18-25
87.0%FT%72.0%
25Rebounds41
9Offensive Rebounds24
16Assists16
13Turnovers11
8Steals7
5Blocks2
19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Auburn
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tahaad PettifordG356-116-101-222010019
Chad Baker-MazaraG345-103-62-235020015
Miles KellyGuard321-80-410-1034500012
Johni BroomeForward324-90-10-17200008
Dylan CardwellCenter224-40-00-03220008
Chaney JohnsonForward242-30-00-01112004
Jahki HowardF112-40-10-04000004
Chris MooreForward81-10-00-00000002
Ja'Heim HudsonForward20-00-00-01000000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zhuric PhelpsGuard236-162-75-1011100019
Wade Taylor IVGuard325-153-73-332000016
Pharrel PayneF185-70-02-250010012
Andersson GarciaForward313-52-23-4115210011
Manny ObasekiGuard144-62-20-012000010
Henry Coleman IIIForward232-40-02-27200006
Hayden HefnerGuard152-40-20-01110004
Jace CarterNot Available111-50-20-01020002
CJ WilcherGuard90-10-12-22100002
Solomon WashingtonF240-20-21-27210001

Advanced Game Stats

62.5Possessions62.5
115.2Offensive Efficiency132.8
132.8Defensive Efficiency115.2
-17.6Net Efficiency17.6
59.0%Effective FG%50.0%
63.0%True Shooting %54.0%
21.3%Turnover Rate17.2%
30.0%Free Throw Rate38.5%
44.0%3-Point Rate38.5%
1.23Assist / Turnover1.45
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 62.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.