Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

75.8%Clemson

24.2%Boston College

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -6.7

PROJECTED TOTAL136.0

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -313

Boston College

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 71

Projected Total136.0

Projected ScoreBoston College 65

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricBoston College

59.9MMH Power Index45.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency100.0

101.4Defensive Efficiency104.8

11.2Net Efficiency-4.8

4.6Strength of Schedule4.8

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.3

63.6Tempo67.4

53.0%Effective FG%47.1%

14.0%Turnover Rate15.4%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

38.1%Free Throw Rate33.2%

7.2Average Margin-3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–100.0), defensive efficiency (101.4–104.8), net efficiency (11.2–-4.8).

Boston College COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.8–4.6), offensive rebounding (28.1–27.0).

Final

Clemson

78—69

Boston College

Clemson by 9 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATBoston College

29-58FG25-60

50.0%FG%42.0%

8-203PT6-18

40.0%3PT%33.0%

12-16FT13-18

75.0%FT%72.0%

43Rebounds26

13Offensive Rebounds7

11Assists11

13Turnovers7

5Steals8

4Blocks4

16Fouls14

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	38	7-12	2-4	5-6	3	0	1	0	21
Chase Hunter	Guard	32	6-10	2-4	4-4	3	3	2	0	18
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	32	6-15	1-5	0-1	8	2	0	1	13
Viktor Lakhin	Center	28	4-5	1-1	2-3	13	1	1	1	11
Chauncey Wiggins	F	12	3-4	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	7
Dillon Hunter	G	26	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	1	1	2	3
Christian Reeves	C	6	1-1	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	3
Del Jones	G	17	1-7	0-2	0-0	5	2	0	0	2
Jake Heidbreder	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Boston College

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jayden Hastings	F	36	8-8	0-0	2-6	5	1	3	2	18
Elijah Strong	F	26	5-9	3-5	2-2	6	0	0	1	15
Dion Brown	G	29	6-15	2-5	0-0	3	1	2	0	14
Joshua Beadle	G	16	2-4	0-0	2-2	2	1	0	0	6
Chas Kelley III	G	17	2-4	0-0	1-2	0	2	0	0	5
Luka Toews	G	19	1-6	0-2	2-2	2	4	0	0	4
Fred Payne	G	15	0-4	0-1	4-4	2	1	2	0	4
Donald Hand Jr.	G	37	1-10	1-5	0-0	3	1	1	1	3
Kany Tchanda	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

116.2Offensive Efficiency102.8

102.8Defensive Efficiency116.2

13.4Net Efficiency-13.4

56.9%Effective FG%46.7%

59.5%True Shooting %50.3%

19.8%Turnover Rate10.2%

27.6%Free Throw Rate30.0%

34.5%3-Point Rate30.0%

0.85Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

Clemson won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.