Virginia Tech

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

32.0%Virginia Tech

68.0%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -6.0

PROJECTED TOTAL145.5

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -212

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVirginia Tech 70

Projected Total145.5

Projected ScoreClemson 76

Team Comparison

Virginia TechMetricClemson

57.7MMH Power Index59.9

112.8Offensive Efficiency112.6

107.2Defensive Efficiency101.4

5.6Net Efficiency11.2

5.8Strength of Schedule4.6

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.8Tempo63.6

52.3%Effective FG%53.0%

14.9%Turnover Rate14.0%

31.1%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

34.7%Free Throw Rate38.1%

3.9Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–57.7), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.2), net efficiency (11.2–5.6), shooting efficiency (53.0–52.3).

Virginia Tech COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.8–112.6), strength of schedule (5.8–4.6), recent form (-3.9–-4.7).

Final

Virginia Tech

47—65

Clemson

Clemson by 18 • 62.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Virginia TechTEAM STATClemson

19-46FG27-61

41.0%FG%44.0%

8-253PT3-20

32.0%3PT%15.0%

1-4FT8-13

25.0%FT%62.0%

30Rebounds35

9Offensive Rebounds15

9Assists11

23Turnovers10

7Steals15

2Blocks3

14Fouls6

Player Box Score

Virginia Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brandon Rechsteiner	G	22	4-10	3-9	0-0	0	1	1	0	11
Jaydon Young	G	30	4-9	2-5	0-0	1	1	1	0	10
Ben Burnham	Forward	27	3-7	1-4	0-0	7	0	0	0	7
Patrick Wessler	F	15	3-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	2	6
Tobi Lawal	F	24	2-7	0-2	1-4	4	2	0	0	5
Tyler Johnson	G	29	1-5	1-2	0-0	1	1	2	0	3
Ben Hammond	G	18	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	2	1	0	3
Mylyjael Poteat	Forward	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	2
Jaden Schutt	G	21	0-2	0-2	0-0	5	2	1	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Viktor Lakhin	Center	25	7-13	0-1	2-2	7	2	2	0	16
Jaeden Zackery	Not Available	34	5-12	1-4	1-2	2	4	4	0	12
Del Jones	G	12	3-5	0-1	2-2	2	1	1	0	8
Chauncey Wiggins	F	23	3-8	1-5	0-0	7	0	0	0	7
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	29	2-5	0-1	1-3	2	0	2	2	5
Chase Hunter	Guard	29	2-9	0-4	0-0	4	3	2	0	4
Myles Foster	Forward	12	1-2	0-0	1-2	5	0	0	1	3
Matt Kelly	Guard	2	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jake Heidbreder	G	14	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	0	3	0	2
Dillon Hunter	G	13	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Christian Reeves	C	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Andrew Latiff	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.1Possessions62.1

75.7Offensive Efficiency104.7

104.7Defensive Efficiency75.7

-29.0Net Efficiency29.0

50.0%Effective FG%46.7%

49.1%True Shooting %48.4%

37.2%Turnover Rate16.1%

8.7%Free Throw Rate21.3%

54.3%3-Point Rate32.8%

0.39Assist / Turnover1.10

Game Summary

Clemson won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 62.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.