Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.9%Texas A&M

52.1%LSU

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLSU -1.2

PROJECTED TOTAL161.4

MODEL MONEYLINELSU -109

LSU

15-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 80

Projected Total161.4

Projected ScoreLSU 81

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricLSU

58MMH Power Index54.2

116.1Offensive Efficiency115.5

108.4Defensive Efficiency111.3

7.7Net Efficiency4.2

4.8Strength of Schedule4.5

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8

69.1Tempo70.5

53.5%Effective FG%53.4%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.6%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

37.5%Free Throw Rate41.9%

5.3Average Margin2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–54.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.3), net efficiency (7.7–4.2).

LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–31.7), free throw rate (41.9–37.5).

Final

Texas A&M

66—52

LSU

Texas A&M by 14 • 63.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATLSU

22-52FG15-50

42.0%FG%30.0%

4-153PT7-26

27.0%3PT%27.0%

18-25FT15-20

72.0%FT%75.0%

42Rebounds27

14Offensive Rebounds7

6Assists7

12Turnovers12

6Steals9

2Blocks8

17Fouls24

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	31	5-13	3-7	4-4	6	0	1	0	17
Henry Coleman III	Forward	25	5-9	0-0	1-2	10	0	1	1	11
Pharrel Payne	F	20	2-5	0-0	5-6	5	1	0	0	9
Andersson Garcia	Forward	30	2-2	0-0	4-4	10	2	1	0	8
Zhuric Phelps	Guard	24	2-8	0-3	2-2	3	1	0	0	6
CJ Wilcher	Guard	10	2-3	1-2	0-0	0	0	1	1	5
Solomon Washington	F	21	1-5	0-2	2-5	5	0	1	0	4
Manny Obaseki	Guard	12	2-5	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	4
Hayden Hefner	Guard	17	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Jace Carter	Not Available	10	0-0	0-0	0-2	0	0	0	0	0

LSU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Sears	Guard	35	6-13	3-8	6-7	3	2	3	0	21
Mike Williams	G	25	3-11	1-5	1-1	4	1	2	2	8
Cam Carter	Guard	34	2-12	2-9	1-2	5	1	0	0	7
Dji Bailey	Guard	35	2-7	0-2	2-2	3	2	0	0	6
Derek Fountain	Forward	27	0-3	0-1	3-4	3	1	0	2	3
Daimion Collins	F	13	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	2	3
Curtis Givens III	G	16	0-2	0-0	2-4	2	0	3	0	2
Robert Miller III	F	15	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	2	2

Advanced Game Stats

63.2Possessions63.2

104.4Offensive Efficiency82.3

82.3Defensive Efficiency104.4

22.2Net Efficiency-22.2

46.2%Effective FG%37.0%

51.7%True Shooting %43.7%

19.4%Turnover Rate18.6%

48.1%Free Throw Rate40.0%

28.8%3-Point Rate52.0%

0.50Assist / Turnover0.58

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 63.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.