
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.9%Harvard
52.1%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -1.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -109

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 71
Projected Total144.2
Projected ScoreColgate 73
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index48.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency111.7
102.9Defensive Efficiency109.0
5.2Net Efficiency2.7
-0.1Strength of Schedule-2.0
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
64.8Tempo68.4
53.4%Effective FG%54.5%
17.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
27.9%Free Throw Rate30.0%
3.4Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–48.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.0), net efficiency (5.2–2.7), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.0).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.7–108.1), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.4), ball security (14.8–17.2).