Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.9%Harvard
52.1%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -1.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.2
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -109
Colgate logo

Colgate

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 71
Projected Total144.2
Projected ScoreColgate 73

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index48.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency111.7
102.9Defensive Efficiency109.0
5.2Net Efficiency2.7
-0.1Strength of Schedule-2.0
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
64.8Tempo68.4
53.4%Effective FG%54.5%
17.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
27.9%Free Throw Rate30.0%
3.4Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–48.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.0), net efficiency (5.2–2.7), strength of schedule (-0.1–-2.0).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.7–108.1), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.4), ball security (14.8–17.2).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
78—69
Colgate logo
Colgate
Harvard by 9 • 68.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATColgate
30-59FG28-59
51.0%FG%47.0%
13-243PT5-18
54.0%3PT%28.0%
5-6FT8-10
83.0%FT%80.0%
30Rebounds32
4Offensive Rebounds6
12Assists17
10Turnovers12
7Steals9
3Blocks2
11Fouls10

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Thomas Batties IIIF368-143-63-371310022
Chandler PiggeG368-152-40-143200018
Tey BarbourG337-104-60-041010018
Robert HintonG334-101-30-01200009
Austin HuntG242-52-22-26220008
Xavier NesbittG51-21-10-00000003
Ben EisendrathG250-20-20-00301000
Ryan SullivanF50-10-00-01000000
Frankie ManninoG30-00-00-01000000
Colgate
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen CoxG367-140-05-558200019
Ben TweedyG366-94-61-244000017
Andrew AlekseyenkoF327-131-42-272000017
Sam WrightF255-100-30-141310010
Cooper WrightF92-20-00-00000004
Ayomi OdetoyinboF131-20-00-05001002
Josh AhayereG300-40-20-02140000
Kyle CarlesimoG190-50-30-01100000

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9
113.2Offensive Efficiency100.1
100.1Defensive Efficiency113.2
13.1Net Efficiency-13.1
61.9%Effective FG%51.7%
63.1%True Shooting %54.1%
14.7%Turnover Rate17.2%
10.2%Free Throw Rate16.9%
40.7%3-Point Rate30.5%
1.20Assist / Turnover1.42
Game Summary
Harvard won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.