
Stanford
20-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.0%Stanford
80.0%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -11.4
PROJECTED TOTAL155.5
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -400

Louisville
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStanford 72
Projected Total155.5
Projected ScoreLouisville 83
Team Comparison
59.2MMH Power Index67.1
111.6Offensive Efficiency118.6
107.1Defensive Efficiency102.2
4.5Net Efficiency16.4
5.2Strength of Schedule6.0
7.4Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
68.1Tempo71.0
51.9%Effective FG%56.9%
15.5%Turnover Rate16.8%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
37.2%Free Throw Rate34.1%
3.0Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–59.2), offensive efficiency (118.6–111.6), defensive efficiency (102.2–107.1), net efficiency (16.4–4.5).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (7.4–1.4), ball security (15.5–16.8), offensive rebounding (32.4–32.3).