USC logo

USC

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.6%USC
96.4%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPurdue -20.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.7
MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -2678
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUSC 69
Projected Total157.7
Projected ScorePurdue 89

Team Comparison

USCMetricPurdue
48.3MMH Power Index73.2
108.5Offensive Efficiency124.8
107.6Defensive Efficiency107.8
0.9Net Efficiency17.0
2.5Strength of Schedule7.6
-16.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
72.4Tempo65.4
50.7%Effective FG%57.8%
17.2%Turnover Rate13.7%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
45.3%Free Throw Rate29.1%
0.7Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–48.3), offensive efficiency (124.8–108.5), net efficiency (17.0–0.9), strength of schedule (7.6–2.5).
USC COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–107.8), free throw rate (45.3–29.1).
Final
USC logo
USC
71—76
Purdue logo
Purdue
Purdue by 5 • 61.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

USCTEAM STATPurdue
27-62FG26-55
44.0%FG%47.0%
7-243PT9-23
29.0%3PT%39.0%
10-14FT15-23
71.0%FT%65.0%
33Rebounds36
16Offensive Rebounds15
12Assists13
10Turnovers10
3Steals2
3Blocks2
22Fouls15

Player Box Score

USC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Desmond ClaudeG218-160-12-232000018
Wesley Yates IIIG395-132-51-273100013
Rashaun AgeeF373-82-53-572010011
Matt KnowlingForward295-50-01-151000011
Chibuzo AgboGuard343-123-90-05000009
Saint ThomasForward302-70-42-32412006
Josh CohenForward91-10-01-12010003
Clark SlajchertGuard10-00-00-00000000
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trey Kaufman-RennF3012-200-06-1172000030
Fletcher LoyerG344-93-73-311000014
Braden SmithG403-101-45-639200012
Camden HeideF303-33-30-111001009
Myles ColvinG213-82-60-05000008
Gicarri HarrisG101-30-20-01000002
C.J. CoxG150-10-11-21100001
Caleb FurstForward180-10-00-02000000
Raleigh BurgessF10-00-00-00000000
Will BergC10-00-00-00001000

Advanced Game Stats

61.8Possessions61.8
114.9Offensive Efficiency123.0
123.0Defensive Efficiency114.9
-8.1Net Efficiency8.1
49.2%Effective FG%55.5%
51.7%True Shooting %57.6%
16.0%Turnover Rate16.4%
22.6%Free Throw Rate41.8%
38.7%3-Point Rate41.8%
1.20Assist / Turnover1.30
Game Summary
Purdue won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 61.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.