
Clemson
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.2%Clemson
78.8%Louisville
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLouisville -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL147.4
MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -372

Louisville
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreClemson 69
Projected Total147.4
Projected ScoreLouisville 79
Team Comparison
59.9MMH Power Index67.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency118.6
101.4Defensive Efficiency102.2
11.2Net Efficiency16.4
4.6Strength of Schedule6.0
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency1.4
63.6Tempo71.0
53.0%Effective FG%56.9%
14.0%Turnover Rate16.8%
27.0%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
38.1%Free Throw Rate34.1%
7.2Average Margin11.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Louisville HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.6–112.6), net efficiency (16.4–11.2), strength of schedule (6.0–4.6).
Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–102.2), ball security (14.0–16.8), free throw rate (38.1–34.1).